Home/Compare/audapolis vs agents

Comparison

audapolis vs agents

Verdict

Pick audapolis when audapolis is primarily TypeScript; agents is Python; pick agents when agents is primarily Python; audapolis is TypeScript.

Markdown twin · audapolis alternatives · agents alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

audapolis logo

audapolis

bugbakery/audapolis

1.9kpushed Jun 24, 2026
vs
agents logo

agents

wshobson/agents

38kpushed Jul 8, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalaudapolisagents
Maintenance
Active (17d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (2d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest

Tagline

audapolis
an editor for spoken-word audio with automatic transcription
agents
Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for various AI agents

Stars

audapolis
1.9k
agents
38k

Forks

audapolis
60
agents
4.0k

Open issues

audapolis
124
agents
1

Language

audapolis
TypeScript
agents
Python

Adopt for

audapolis
-
agents
The agents tool is a marketplace for plugins that enhances multiple AI agents, offering integration and management capabilities across several platforms, including Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot

Persona

audapolis
-
agents
-

Runtime

audapolis
-
agents
-

License

audapolis
AGPL-3.0
agents
MIT

Last pushed

audapolis
Jun 24, 2026
agents
Jul 8, 2026

Categories

audapolis
Developer Tools, Speech & Audio
agents
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

audapolis
Active (82%)
agents
Very active (96%)

Days since push

audapolis
17d
agents
2d

Open issues (now)

audapolis
124
agents
1

Owner type

audapolis
Organization
agents
User

Security scan

audapolis
No lockfile
agents
No MCP manifest

Full report

audapolis
Trust report

Choose audapolis if…

  • audapolis is primarily TypeScript; agents is Python.
  • License: audapolis is AGPL-3.0, agents is MIT.
  • Tags unique to audapolis: audio-editing, speech-to-text, transcription, typescript.
  • Also covers Speech & Audio.

When NOT to use audapolis

  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Choose agents if…

  • agents is primarily Python; audapolis is TypeScript.
  • License: agents is MIT, audapolis is AGPL-3.0.
  • Tags unique to agents: agent-skills, agentic-ai, automation, prompt-engineering.
  • Also covers AI Agents.
  • You are working specifically within the ecosystems of Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, or Gemini CLI, as it provides tailored plugins for these environments

When NOT to use agents

  • You are working solely within a niche environment that isn't one of the supported platforms (like Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc.) because it may not offer compatible plugins or extensive support
  • Your project requirements do not include interoperability between multiple AI agents and you only need to leverage functionalities from a single AI agent with a robust in-built plugin ecosystem

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: audapolis 1.9k · agents 38k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between audapolis and agents?
audapolis: an editor for spoken-word audio with automatic transcription. agents: Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for various AI agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose audapolis over agents?
Choose audapolis over agents when audapolis is primarily TypeScript; agents is Python; License: audapolis is AGPL-3.0, agents is MIT; Tags unique to audapolis: audio-editing, speech-to-text, transcription, typescript; Also covers Speech & Audio.
When should I choose agents over audapolis?
Choose agents over audapolis when agents is primarily Python; audapolis is TypeScript; License: agents is MIT, audapolis is AGPL-3.0; Tags unique to agents: agent-skills, agentic-ai, automation, prompt-engineering; Also covers AI Agents; You are working specifically within the ecosystems of Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, or Gemini CLI, as it provides tailored plugins for these environments.
When should I avoid audapolis?
Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid agents?
You are working solely within a niche environment that isn't one of the supported platforms (like Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc.) because it may not offer compatible plugins or extensive support Your project requirements do not include interoperability between multiple AI agents and you only need to leverage functionalities from a single AI agent with a robust in-built plugin ecosystem
Is audapolis or agents more popular on GitHub?
agents has more GitHub stars (37,779 vs 1,868). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are audapolis and agents open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (audapolis: AGPL-3.0, agents: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to audapolis or agents?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at audapolis alternatives and agents alternatives (audapolis markdown twin, agents markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, audapolis or agents?
audapolis: Active. agents: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for audapolis and agents?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: audapolis trust report; agents trust report.