GraphCanon
Home/Compare/oh-my-pi vs cc-switch

Comparison

oh-my-pi vs cc-switch

Verdict

Pick oh-my-pi when oh-my-pi is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust; pick cc-switch when cc-switch is primarily Rust; oh-my-pi is TypeScript.

Markdown twin · oh-my-pi alternatives · cc-switch alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

oh-my-pi logo

oh-my-pi

can1357/oh-my-pi

★ 17kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
cc-switch logo

cc-switch

farion1231/cc-switch

★ 116kpushed Jul 11, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signaloh-my-picc-switch
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest
oh-my-pi trust reportcc-switch trust reportTrust methodology

Tagline

oh-my-pi
⌥ AI Coding agent for the terminal — hash-anchored edits, optimized tool harness, LSP, Python, browser, subagents, and more
cc-switch
A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io

Stars

oh-my-pi
17k
cc-switch
116k

Forks

oh-my-pi
1.5k
cc-switch
7.8k

Open issues

oh-my-pi
718
cc-switch
1.9k

Language

oh-my-pi
TypeScript
cc-switch
Rust

Adopt for

oh-my-pi
-
cc-switch
-

Persona

oh-my-pi
-
cc-switch
-

Runtime

oh-my-pi
-
cc-switch
-

License

oh-my-pi
MIT
cc-switch
MIT

Last pushed

oh-my-pi
Jul 11, 2026
cc-switch
Jul 11, 2026

Categories

oh-my-pi
AI Agents, Developer Tools, LLM Frameworks
cc-switch
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Open issues (now)

oh-my-pi
718
cc-switch
1.9k

Full report

oh-my-pi
Trust report
cc-switch
Trust report

Choose oh-my-pi if…

  • oh-my-pi is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust.
  • Tags unique to oh-my-pi: ai-agent, ai-coding-agent, anthropic, bun.
  • Also covers LLM Frameworks.

When NOT to use oh-my-pi

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
GitHubDetails

Choose cc-switch if…

  • cc-switch is primarily Rust; oh-my-pi is TypeScript.
  • Tags unique to cc-switch: ai-tools, claude-code, codex, desktop-app.
  • More GitHub stars (116k vs 17k) - visibility, not fit.

When NOT to use cc-switch

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
GitHubDetails

Explore

oh-my-pi trust report →cc-switch trust report →AI Agents category →Developer Tools category →LLM Frameworks category →All comparisonsStack workflowsTrending tools

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: oh-my-pi 17k · cc-switch 116k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between oh-my-pi and cc-switch?
oh-my-pi: ⌥ AI Coding agent for the terminal — hash-anchored edits, optimized tool harness, LSP, Python, browser, subagents, and more. cc-switch: A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose oh-my-pi over cc-switch?
Choose oh-my-pi over cc-switch when oh-my-pi is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust; Tags unique to oh-my-pi: ai-agent, ai-coding-agent, anthropic, bun; Also covers LLM Frameworks.
When should I choose cc-switch over oh-my-pi?
Choose cc-switch over oh-my-pi when cc-switch is primarily Rust; oh-my-pi is TypeScript; Tags unique to cc-switch: ai-tools, claude-code, codex, desktop-app; More GitHub stars (116k vs 17k) - visibility, not fit.
When should I avoid oh-my-pi?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
When should I avoid cc-switch?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Is oh-my-pi or cc-switch more popular on GitHub?
cc-switch has more GitHub stars (115,863 vs 17,246). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are oh-my-pi and cc-switch open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (oh-my-pi: MIT, cc-switch: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to oh-my-pi or cc-switch?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at oh-my-pi alternatives and cc-switch alternatives (oh-my-pi markdown twin, cc-switch markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, oh-my-pi or cc-switch?
oh-my-pi: Very active. cc-switch: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for oh-my-pi and cc-switch?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: oh-my-pi trust report; cc-switch trust report.