Comparison
edict vs AutoGPT
Verdict
Pick edict if edict is a multi-agent orchestration system featuring nine specialized AI agents with real-time dashboards, customizable configurations, and full audit trails. It leverages Docker for easy setup and focuses on seamless,古; pick AutoGPT if autoGPT is a platform for building and using autonomous AI agents, offering both self-hosting and managed service options.
Markdown twin · edict alternatives · AutoGPT alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026
14views this month
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | edict | AutoGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active (13d since push) As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11 As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- edict
- Three Departments Six Ministries System · OpenClaw Multi-Agent Orchestration System: 9 specialized AI agents include real-time dashboard, model configuration, and complete audit trails
- AutoGPT
- Accessible AI for everyone, providing tools for focus on what matters
Stars
- edict
- 17k
- AutoGPT
- 187k
Forks
- edict
- 1.8k
- AutoGPT
- 46k
Open issues
- edict
- 19
- AutoGPT
- 593
Language
- edict
- Python
- AutoGPT
- Python
Adopt for
- edict
- Edict is a multi-agent orchestration system featuring nine specialized AI agents with real-time dashboards, customizable configurations, and full audit trails. It leverages Docker for easy setup and focuses on seamless,古
- AutoGPT
- AutoGPT is a platform for building and using autonomous AI agents, offering both self-hosting and managed service options.
Persona
- edict
- -
- AutoGPT
- -
Runtime
- edict
- -
- AutoGPT
- -
License
- edict
- MIT License offers permissive use for both commercial and private projects with conditions to preserve the copyright notice.
- AutoGPT
- AutoGPT's `autogpt_platform/` component is licensed under Polyform Shield, which is free for personal and internal business use but cannot be sold as a competing hosted service. The `classic/` and all
Last pushed
- edict
- Sep 7, 2026
- AutoGPT
- Sep 18, 2026
Categories
- edict
- AI Agents
- AutoGPT
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
Trust and health
Maintenance
- edict
- Active (82%)
- AutoGPT
- Very active (96%)
Days since push
- edict
- 13d
- AutoGPT
- 0d
Open issues (now)
- edict
- 19
- AutoGPT
- 593
Stars delta
- edict
- +516 (30d)
- AutoGPT
- +801 (30d)
Open issues delta
- edict
- -12 (30d)
- AutoGPT
- +76 (30d)
Owner type
- edict
- User
- AutoGPT
- Organization
OSV dependency advisories
- edict
- No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
- AutoGPT
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- edict
- Trust report
- AutoGPT
- Trust report
Choose edict if…
- License: edict is MIT, AutoGPT is Other.
- Pricing: Free under MIT license but additional support or services might incur costs.
- Requirements: Requires Docker.
- Tags unique to edict: ai-agents, ai-orchestration, dashboard, multi-agent.
- edict ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you need a set of 9 specialized AI agents designed for specific tasks within an orchestrated environment
When NOT to use edict
- If you are working within complex enterprise environments with proprietary security requirements that Edict's MIT license might conflict with
- When your use case requires more agents or flexibility beyond what the pre-defined nine agents in Edict offer without significant manual integration efforts
- In scenarios where Docker-based deployment is not suitable for your infrastructure, such as platforms where cross-architecture errors using Docker are frequent
Choose AutoGPT if…
- License: AutoGPT is Other, edict is MIT.
- Tags unique to AutoGPT: agentic-ai, agents, ai, artificial-intelligence.
- Also covers Developer Tools.
- When you need full control over your infrastructure and data, as self-hosting allows you to run AutoGPT on your own servers.
When NOT to use AutoGPT
- If you require immediate setup without the need for infrastructure management, as the managed service option is more suitable for quick deployment.
- When you are looking for a fully managed solution with built-in model access, as the managed platform handles updates and operations for you.
- If you are seeking a paid plan with plan-dependent support, as the self-hosted option relies on community support.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (cft0808/edict) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (cft0808/edict) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (cft0808/edict) · observed Sep 7, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Sep 18, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: edict 17k · AutoGPT 187k (synced Sep 20, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between edict and AutoGPT?
- edict: Three Departments Six Ministries System · OpenClaw Multi-Agent Orchestration System: 9 specialized AI agents include real-time dashboard, model configuration, and complete audit trails. AutoGPT: Accessible AI for everyone, providing tools for focus on what matters. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose edict over AutoGPT?
- Choose edict over AutoGPT when License: edict is MIT, AutoGPT is Other; Pricing: Free under MIT license but additional support or services might incur costs; Requirements: Requires Docker; Tags unique to edict: ai-agents, ai-orchestration, dashboard, multi-agent; edict ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need a set of 9 specialized AI agents designed for specific tasks within an orchestrated environment.
- When should I choose AutoGPT over edict?
- Choose AutoGPT over edict when License: AutoGPT is Other, edict is MIT; Tags unique to AutoGPT: agentic-ai, agents, ai, artificial-intelligence; Also covers Developer Tools; When you need full control over your infrastructure and data, as self-hosting allows you to run AutoGPT on your own servers.
- When should I avoid edict?
- If you are working within complex enterprise environments with proprietary security requirements that Edict's MIT license might conflict with When your use case requires more agents or flexibility beyond what the pre-defined nine agents in Edict offer without significant manual integration efforts In scenarios where Docker-based deployment is not suitable for your infrastructure, such as platforms where cross-architecture errors using Docker are frequent
- When should I avoid AutoGPT?
- If you require immediate setup without the need for infrastructure management, as the managed service option is more suitable for quick deployment. When you are looking for a fully managed solution with built-in model access, as the managed platform handles updates and operations for you. If you are seeking a paid plan with plan-dependent support, as the self-hosted option relies on community support.
- Is edict or AutoGPT more popular on GitHub?
- AutoGPT has more GitHub stars (187,424 vs 16,901). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are edict and AutoGPT open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (edict: MIT, AutoGPT: Other).
- Where can I find alternatives to edict or AutoGPT?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at edict alternatives and AutoGPT alternatives (edict markdown twin, AutoGPT markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, edict or AutoGPT?
- edict: Active. AutoGPT: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for edict and AutoGPT?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: edict trust report; AutoGPT trust report.