vigil-llm vs kereva-scanner

Common questions

What is the difference between vigil-llm and kereva-scanner?

vigil-llm: Detect prompt injections and other risky inputs in LLMs. kereva-scanner: Code scanner to check for issues in prompts and LLM calls. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

When should I choose vigil-llm over kereva-scanner?

Choose vigil-llm over kereva-scanner when Tags unique to vigil-llm: adversarial-attacks, large-language-models; vigil-llm ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When deploying large language models that require high levels of input security, vigil-llm can be employed to detect maliciously crafted inputs intended to manipulate model behavior.

When should I choose kereva-scanner over vigil-llm?

Choose kereva-scanner over vigil-llm when Pricing: The tool is free under the Apache-2.0 license but may have features in a paid version not detailed in the repository.; Requirements: ; Tags unique to kereva-scanner: ai-code-review, hallucination, llm-evaluation, owasp-llm-top-10; Also covers Developer Tools; When you are developing applications involving AI-generated content or integrations with large language models, to ensure your prompts are secure against attacks such as prompt injection.

When should I avoid vigil-llm?

If your application does not require high security against malicious inputs or if the risks of prompt injection are minimal due to controlled input sources, vigil-llm might be unnecessary. For projects that focus on optimizing output speed rather than input robustness, other tools might be more appropriate as vigil-llm could add significant processing overhead.

When should I avoid kereva-scanner?

When your project does not involve interactions with language models or AI-generated content, since the scanner's utility is primarily in evaluating AI-related issues. If you are looking for a comprehensive general code linter that checks for coding standard violations or general best practices unrelated to security and performance of LLMs.

Is vigil-llm or kereva-scanner more popular on GitHub?

vigil-llm has more GitHub stars (496 vs 78). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

Are vigil-llm and kereva-scanner open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (vigil-llm: Apache-2.0, kereva-scanner: Apache-2.0).

Where can I find alternatives to vigil-llm or kereva-scanner?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at vigil-llm alternatives and kereva-scanner alternatives (vigil-llm markdown twin, kereva-scanner markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

Which is better maintained, vigil-llm or kereva-scanner?

vigil-llm: Dormant. kereva-scanner: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

Where are the full trust reports for vigil-llm and kereva-scanner?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: vigil-llm trust report; kereva-scanner trust report.