Comparison
instruct-eval vs HLCE
Verdict
Pick instruct-eval if key facts about instruct-eval; pick HLCE if hLCE offers evaluation scripts to assess code generation using LLMs, specifically for research purposes.
Markdown twin · instruct-eval alternatives · HLCE alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | instruct-eval | HLCE |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (879d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Slowing (352d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of 1mo · osv@v1 | Published findings As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- instruct-eval
- Quantitative evaluation for instruction-tuned language models
- HLCE
- Source Evaluation scripts for Humanity's Last Code Exam
Stars
- instruct-eval
- 552
- HLCE
- 96
Forks
- instruct-eval
- 45
- HLCE
- 8
Open issues
- instruct-eval
- 24
- HLCE
- 1
Language
- instruct-eval
- Python
- HLCE
- Python
Adopt for
- instruct-eval
- Key facts about instruct-eval
- HLCE
- HLCE offers evaluation scripts to assess code generation using LLMs, specifically for research purposes.
Persona
- instruct-eval
- -
- HLCE
- -
Runtime
- instruct-eval
- -
- HLCE
- -
License
- instruct-eval
- The tool is distributed under Apache-2.0 license
- HLCE
- -
Last pushed
- instruct-eval
- Mar 10, 2024
- HLCE
- Aug 21, 2025
Categories
- instruct-eval
- Evaluation & Observability
- HLCE
- Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks
Trust and health
Maintenance
- instruct-eval
- Dormant (18%)
- HLCE
- Slowing (36%)
Days since push
- instruct-eval
- 879d
- HLCE
- 352d
Open issues (now)
- instruct-eval
- 24
- HLCE
- 1
Full report
- instruct-eval
- Trust report
- HLCE
- Trust report
Choose instruct-eval if…
- Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Requires Python environment setup and specific dependencies as outlined in the repository's documentation..
- Tags unique to instruct-eval: benchmarking, evaluation, instruct-tuning, llm.
- When you need to quantitatively evaluate the performance of instruction-tuned large language models such as Alpaca and Flan-T5 on held-out tasks.
When NOT to use instruct-eval
- When primarily interested in general model evaluation without a focus on instruction-tuned LMs.
- If your primary interest lies in qualitative assessment rather than quantitative metrics.
- If you need support for non-HuggingFace Transformer models, as instruct-eval mainly supports models from the HuggingFace ecosystem.
Choose HLCE if…
- Tags unique to HLCE: benchmark, codegen, codellm, llm-evaluation.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks.
- When you are researching the capabilities of language models in generating code and need benchmarking tools that focus on this aspect exclusively.
When NOT to use HLCE
- If you require tools that cater to general-purpose evaluation beyond the scope of LLM code generation in a research context.
- When proprietary or non-research licenses are necessary, since HLCE does not detail its licensing beyond being for research purposes only.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (declare-lab/instruct-eval) · observed Aug 7, 2026
- GitHub forks (declare-lab/instruct-eval) · observed Aug 7, 2026
- Last push (declare-lab/instruct-eval) · observed Mar 10, 2024
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Aug 7, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 12, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (Humanity-s-Last-Code-Exam/HLCE) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- GitHub forks (Humanity-s-Last-Code-Exam/HLCE) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Last push (Humanity-s-Last-Code-Exam/HLCE) · observed Aug 21, 2025
- License file (unknown) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: instruct-eval 552 · HLCE 96 (synced Aug 7, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between instruct-eval and HLCE?
- instruct-eval: Quantitative evaluation for instruction-tuned language models. HLCE: Source Evaluation scripts for Humanity's Last Code Exam. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose instruct-eval over HLCE?
- Choose instruct-eval over HLCE when Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Requires Python environment setup and specific dependencies as outlined in the repository's documentation.; Tags unique to instruct-eval: benchmarking, evaluation, instruct-tuning, llm; When you need to quantitatively evaluate the performance of instruction-tuned large language models such as Alpaca and Flan-T5 on held-out tasks.
- When should I choose HLCE over instruct-eval?
- Choose HLCE over instruct-eval when Tags unique to HLCE: benchmark, codegen, codellm, llm-evaluation; Also covers LLM Frameworks; When you are researching the capabilities of language models in generating code and need benchmarking tools that focus on this aspect exclusively.
- When should I avoid instruct-eval?
- When primarily interested in general model evaluation without a focus on instruction-tuned LMs. If your primary interest lies in qualitative assessment rather than quantitative metrics. If you need support for non-HuggingFace Transformer models, as instruct-eval mainly supports models from the HuggingFace ecosystem.
- When should I avoid HLCE?
- If you require tools that cater to general-purpose evaluation beyond the scope of LLM code generation in a research context. When proprietary or non-research licenses are necessary, since HLCE does not detail its licensing beyond being for research purposes only.
- Is instruct-eval or HLCE more popular on GitHub?
- instruct-eval has more GitHub stars (552 vs 96). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are instruct-eval and HLCE open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.
- Where can I find alternatives to instruct-eval or HLCE?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at instruct-eval alternatives and HLCE alternatives (instruct-eval markdown twin, HLCE markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, instruct-eval or HLCE?
- instruct-eval: Dormant. HLCE: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for instruct-eval and HLCE?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: instruct-eval trust report; HLCE trust report.