Home/Compare/DeepSeek-R1 vs nndeploy

Comparison

DeepSeek-R1 vs nndeploy

Verdict

Pick DeepSeek-R1 when license: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, nndeploy is Apache-2.0; pick nndeploy when license: nndeploy is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT.

Markdown twin · DeepSeek-R1 alternatives · nndeploy alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

DeepSeek-R1 logo

DeepSeek-R1

deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1

92kpushed Jun 27, 2025
vs
nndeploy logo

nndeploy

nndeploy/nndeploy

1.8kpushed Apr 25, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalDeepSeek-R1nndeploy
Maintenance
Dormant (379d since push)
As of 3d · github_public_v1
Steady (80d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 3d · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 4d · osv@v1
Published findings
As of today · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

DeepSeek-R1
Repository contains distilled LLM models derived from Qwen and LLaMA series for various commercial uses.
nndeploy
一款简单易用和高性能的AI部署框架 | An Easy-to-Use and High-Performance AI Deployment Framework

Stars

DeepSeek-R1
92k
nndeploy
1.8k

Forks

DeepSeek-R1
12k
nndeploy
226

Open issues

DeepSeek-R1
45
nndeploy
23

Language

DeepSeek-R1
-
nndeploy
C++

Adopt for

DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek-R1 provides a set of distilled LLMs from Qwen and LLaMA series that support commercial use.
nndeploy
-

Persona

DeepSeek-R1
-
nndeploy
-

Runtime

DeepSeek-R1
-
nndeploy
-

License

DeepSeek-R1
MIT
nndeploy
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

DeepSeek-R1
Jun 27, 2025
nndeploy
Apr 25, 2026

Categories

DeepSeek-R1
LLM Frameworks, Model Training
nndeploy
Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks, Model Training

Trust and health

Maintenance

DeepSeek-R1
Dormant (18%)
nndeploy
Steady (60%)

Days since push

DeepSeek-R1
379d
nndeploy
80d

Open issues (now)

DeepSeek-R1
45
nndeploy
23

OSV dependency advisories

DeepSeek-R1
No lockfile (source not queried)
nndeploy
Published findings

Full report

DeepSeek-R1
Trust report
nndeploy
Trust report

Choose DeepSeek-R1 if…

  • License: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, nndeploy is Apache-2.0.
  • Pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository..
  • Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs..
  • Tags unique to DeepSeek-R1: commercial use, derived models, distilled models, mit license.
  • When you need to work with pre-trained models derived specifically from the Qwen-2.5 and Llama3.x series, benefiting from their unique characteristics.

When NOT to use DeepSeek-R1

  • Avoid if you need foundational models rather than distilled versions, as DeepSeek-R1 specializes in providing smaller, more efficient models suitable for resource-constrained environments.
  • If your project is tightly regulated or requires models from a different lineage, as DeepSeek-R1 exclusively provides derivatives of Qwen and LLaMA series.

Choose nndeploy if…

  • License: nndeploy is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT.
  • Tags unique to nndeploy: ai, ascend, deep-learning, deployment.
  • Also covers Inference & Serving.

When NOT to use nndeploy

  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: DeepSeek-R1 92k · nndeploy 1.8k (synced Jul 12, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between DeepSeek-R1 and nndeploy?
DeepSeek-R1: Repository contains distilled LLM models derived from Qwen and LLaMA series for various commercial uses.. nndeploy: 一款简单易用和高性能的AI部署框架 | An Easy-to-Use and High-Performance AI Deployment Framework. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose DeepSeek-R1 over nndeploy?
Choose DeepSeek-R1 over nndeploy when License: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, nndeploy is Apache-2.0; Pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs.; Tags unique to DeepSeek-R1: commercial use, derived models, distilled models, mit license; When you need to work with pre-trained models derived specifically from the Qwen-2.5 and Llama3.x series, benefiting from their unique characteristics.
When should I choose nndeploy over DeepSeek-R1?
Choose nndeploy over DeepSeek-R1 when License: nndeploy is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT; Tags unique to nndeploy: ai, ascend, deep-learning, deployment; Also covers Inference & Serving.
When should I avoid DeepSeek-R1?
Avoid if you need foundational models rather than distilled versions, as DeepSeek-R1 specializes in providing smaller, more efficient models suitable for resource-constrained environments. If your project is tightly regulated or requires models from a different lineage, as DeepSeek-R1 exclusively provides derivatives of Qwen and LLaMA series.
When should I avoid nndeploy?
Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
Is DeepSeek-R1 or nndeploy more popular on GitHub?
DeepSeek-R1 has more GitHub stars (91,991 vs 1,847). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are DeepSeek-R1 and nndeploy open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (DeepSeek-R1: MIT, nndeploy: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to DeepSeek-R1 or nndeploy?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at DeepSeek-R1 alternatives and nndeploy alternatives (DeepSeek-R1 markdown twin, nndeploy markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, DeepSeek-R1 or nndeploy?
DeepSeek-R1: Dormant. nndeploy: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for DeepSeek-R1 and nndeploy?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: DeepSeek-R1 trust report; nndeploy trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.