Comparison
DeepSeek-R1 vs nndeploy
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek-R1 when license: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, nndeploy is Apache-2.0; pick nndeploy when license: nndeploy is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT.
Markdown twin · DeepSeek-R1 alternatives · nndeploy alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | DeepSeek-R1 | nndeploy |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (379d since push) As of 3d · github_public_v1 | Steady (80d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 3d · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 4d · osv@v1 | Published findings As of today · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- DeepSeek-R1
- Repository contains distilled LLM models derived from Qwen and LLaMA series for various commercial uses.
- nndeploy
- 一款简单易用和高性能的AI部署框架 | An Easy-to-Use and High-Performance AI Deployment Framework
Stars
- DeepSeek-R1
- 92k
- nndeploy
- 1.8k
Forks
- DeepSeek-R1
- 12k
- nndeploy
- 226
Open issues
- DeepSeek-R1
- 45
- nndeploy
- 23
Language
- DeepSeek-R1
- -
- nndeploy
- C++
Adopt for
- DeepSeek-R1
- DeepSeek-R1 provides a set of distilled LLMs from Qwen and LLaMA series that support commercial use.
- nndeploy
- -
Persona
- DeepSeek-R1
- -
- nndeploy
- -
Runtime
- DeepSeek-R1
- -
- nndeploy
- -
License
- DeepSeek-R1
- MIT
- nndeploy
- Apache-2.0
Last pushed
- DeepSeek-R1
- Jun 27, 2025
- nndeploy
- Apr 25, 2026
Categories
- DeepSeek-R1
- LLM Frameworks, Model Training
- nndeploy
- Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks, Model Training
Trust and health
Maintenance
- DeepSeek-R1
- Dormant (18%)
- nndeploy
- Steady (60%)
Days since push
- DeepSeek-R1
- 379d
- nndeploy
- 80d
Open issues (now)
- DeepSeek-R1
- 45
- nndeploy
- 23
OSV dependency advisories
- DeepSeek-R1
- No lockfile (source not queried)
- nndeploy
- Published findings
Full report
- DeepSeek-R1
- Trust report
- nndeploy
- Trust report
Choose DeepSeek-R1 if…
- License: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, nndeploy is Apache-2.0.
- Pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository..
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs..
- Tags unique to DeepSeek-R1: commercial use, derived models, distilled models, mit license.
- When you need to work with pre-trained models derived specifically from the Qwen-2.5 and Llama3.x series, benefiting from their unique characteristics.
When NOT to use DeepSeek-R1
- Avoid if you need foundational models rather than distilled versions, as DeepSeek-R1 specializes in providing smaller, more efficient models suitable for resource-constrained environments.
- If your project is tightly regulated or requires models from a different lineage, as DeepSeek-R1 exclusively provides derivatives of Qwen and LLaMA series.
Choose nndeploy if…
- License: nndeploy is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT.
- Tags unique to nndeploy: ai, ascend, deep-learning, deployment.
- Also covers Inference & Serving.
When NOT to use nndeploy
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1) · observed Jul 12, 2026
- GitHub forks (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1) · observed Jul 12, 2026
- Last push (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1) · observed Jun 27, 2025
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 12, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (nndeploy/nndeploy) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- GitHub forks (nndeploy/nndeploy) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Last push (nndeploy/nndeploy) · observed Apr 25, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: DeepSeek-R1 92k · nndeploy 1.8k (synced Jul 12, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between DeepSeek-R1 and nndeploy?
- DeepSeek-R1: Repository contains distilled LLM models derived from Qwen and LLaMA series for various commercial uses.. nndeploy: 一款简单易用和高性能的AI部署框架 | An Easy-to-Use and High-Performance AI Deployment Framework. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose DeepSeek-R1 over nndeploy?
- Choose DeepSeek-R1 over nndeploy when License: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, nndeploy is Apache-2.0; Pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs.; Tags unique to DeepSeek-R1: commercial use, derived models, distilled models, mit license; When you need to work with pre-trained models derived specifically from the Qwen-2.5 and Llama3.x series, benefiting from their unique characteristics.
- When should I choose nndeploy over DeepSeek-R1?
- Choose nndeploy over DeepSeek-R1 when License: nndeploy is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT; Tags unique to nndeploy: ai, ascend, deep-learning, deployment; Also covers Inference & Serving.
- When should I avoid DeepSeek-R1?
- Avoid if you need foundational models rather than distilled versions, as DeepSeek-R1 specializes in providing smaller, more efficient models suitable for resource-constrained environments. If your project is tightly regulated or requires models from a different lineage, as DeepSeek-R1 exclusively provides derivatives of Qwen and LLaMA series.
- When should I avoid nndeploy?
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
- Is DeepSeek-R1 or nndeploy more popular on GitHub?
- DeepSeek-R1 has more GitHub stars (91,991 vs 1,847). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are DeepSeek-R1 and nndeploy open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (DeepSeek-R1: MIT, nndeploy: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to DeepSeek-R1 or nndeploy?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at DeepSeek-R1 alternatives and nndeploy alternatives (DeepSeek-R1 markdown twin, nndeploy markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, DeepSeek-R1 or nndeploy?
- DeepSeek-R1: Dormant. nndeploy: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for DeepSeek-R1 and nndeploy?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: DeepSeek-R1 trust report; nndeploy trust report.