Comparison
magic vs AutoGPT
Verdict
Pick magic if magic is an open-source suite combining AI agents with workflow management and collaboration tools like instant messaging; pick AutoGPT if autoGPT is a platform for building and using autonomous AI agents, offering both self-hosting and managed service options.
Markdown twin · magic alternatives · AutoGPT alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | magic | AutoGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Steady (33d since push) As of Sep 15, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 15, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 19, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- magic
- All-in-one AI productivity platform
- AutoGPT
- Accessible AI for everyone, providing tools for focus on what matters
Stars
- magic
- 5.0k
- AutoGPT
- 187k
Forks
- magic
- 561
- AutoGPT
- 46k
Open issues
- magic
- 17
- AutoGPT
- 593
Language
- magic
- TypeScript
- AutoGPT
- Python
Adopt for
- magic
- Magic is an open-source suite combining AI agents with workflow management and collaboration tools like instant messaging.
- AutoGPT
- AutoGPT is a platform for building and using autonomous AI agents, offering both self-hosting and managed service options.
Persona
- magic
- -
- AutoGPT
- -
Runtime
- magic
- -
- AutoGPT
- -
License
- magic
- Magic Open Source License based on Apache 2.0 with additional restrictions, ensuring modifications are open but retaining copyrights and disclaimers as per the license.
- AutoGPT
- AutoGPT's `autogpt_platform/` component is licensed under Polyform Shield, which is free for personal and internal business use but cannot be sold as a competing hosted service. The `classic/` and all
Last pushed
- magic
- Aug 12, 2026
- AutoGPT
- Sep 18, 2026
Categories
- magic
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
- AutoGPT
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
Trust and health
Maintenance
- magic
- Steady (60%)
- AutoGPT
- Very active (96%)
Days since push
- magic
- 33d
- AutoGPT
- 0d
Open issues (now)
- magic
- 17
- AutoGPT
- 593
Stars delta
- magic
- +48 (30d)
- AutoGPT
- +801 (30d)
Open issues delta
- magic
- +3 (30d)
- AutoGPT
- +76 (30d)
Full report
- magic
- Trust report
- AutoGPT
- Trust report
Choose magic if…
- magic is primarily TypeScript; AutoGPT is Python.
- Requirements: Requires Docker.
- Tags unique to magic: agent, agi, llm, low-code.
- When a diverse set of functionalities under one platform is required for managing workflows, automating tasks, and enabling seamless communication among team members.
When NOT to use magic
- When focused exclusively on a specialized aspect of AI development like model training, as Magic offers an all-in-one solution which might add unnecessary complexity.
- For users requiring immediate Windows OS compatibility without waiting for upcoming support releases, given that Windows is not currently supported in self-hosted setups.
Choose AutoGPT if…
- AutoGPT is primarily Python; magic is TypeScript.
- Tags unique to AutoGPT: agentic-ai, agents, artificial-intelligence, autonomous-agents.
- When you need full control over your infrastructure and data, as self-hosting allows you to run AutoGPT on your own servers.
When NOT to use AutoGPT
- If you require immediate setup without the need for infrastructure management, as the managed service option is more suitable for quick deployment.
- When you are looking for a fully managed solution with built-in model access, as the managed platform handles updates and operations for you.
- If you are seeking a paid plan with plan-dependent support, as the self-hosted option relies on community support.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (dtyq/magic) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (dtyq/magic) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (dtyq/magic) · observed Aug 12, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 19, 2026
- GitHub stars (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Sep 18, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: magic 5.0k · AutoGPT 187k (synced Sep 20, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between magic and AutoGPT?
- magic: All-in-one AI productivity platform. AutoGPT: Accessible AI for everyone, providing tools for focus on what matters. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose magic over AutoGPT?
- Choose magic over AutoGPT when magic is primarily TypeScript; AutoGPT is Python; Requirements: Requires Docker; Tags unique to magic: agent, agi, llm, low-code; When a diverse set of functionalities under one platform is required for managing workflows, automating tasks, and enabling seamless communication among team members.
- When should I choose AutoGPT over magic?
- Choose AutoGPT over magic when AutoGPT is primarily Python; magic is TypeScript; Tags unique to AutoGPT: agentic-ai, agents, artificial-intelligence, autonomous-agents; When you need full control over your infrastructure and data, as self-hosting allows you to run AutoGPT on your own servers.
- When should I avoid magic?
- When focused exclusively on a specialized aspect of AI development like model training, as Magic offers an all-in-one solution which might add unnecessary complexity. For users requiring immediate Windows OS compatibility without waiting for upcoming support releases, given that Windows is not currently supported in self-hosted setups.
- When should I avoid AutoGPT?
- If you require immediate setup without the need for infrastructure management, as the managed service option is more suitable for quick deployment. When you are looking for a fully managed solution with built-in model access, as the managed platform handles updates and operations for you. If you are seeking a paid plan with plan-dependent support, as the self-hosted option relies on community support.
- Is magic or AutoGPT more popular on GitHub?
- AutoGPT has more GitHub stars (187,424 vs 5,027). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are magic and AutoGPT open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (magic: Other, AutoGPT: Other).
- Where can I find alternatives to magic or AutoGPT?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at magic alternatives and AutoGPT alternatives (magic markdown twin, AutoGPT markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, magic or AutoGPT?
- magic: Steady. AutoGPT: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for magic and AutoGPT?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: magic trust report; AutoGPT trust report.