Home/Compare/agentdojo vs eval-view

Comparison

agentdojo vs eval-view

Verdict

Pick agentdojo if agentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents; pick eval-view if regression testing for AI agents to detect behavioral changes and output quality regressions over time.

Markdown twin · agentdojo alternatives · eval-view alternatives

GraphCanon updated 2w

agentdojo logo

agentdojo

ethz-spylab/agentdojo

716pushed Jun 2, 2026
vs
eval-view logo

eval-view

hidai25/eval-view

126pushed Jul 26, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalagentdojoeval-view
Maintenance
Steady (63d since push)
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Very active (6d since push)
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 3w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

agentdojo
A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents
eval-view
Regression testing for AI agents

Stars

agentdojo
716
eval-view
126

Forks

agentdojo
188
eval-view
21

Open issues

agentdojo
41
eval-view
3

Language

agentdojo
Python
eval-view
Python

Adopt for

agentdojo
AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.
eval-view
Regression testing for AI agents to detect behavioral changes and output quality regressions over time.

Persona

agentdojo
-
eval-view
-

Runtime

agentdojo
-
eval-view
-

License

agentdojo
MIT
eval-view
The software uses the Apache-2.0 license, offering permissive terms for use and distribution.

Last pushed

agentdojo
Jun 2, 2026
eval-view
Jul 26, 2026

Categories

agentdojo
AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability
eval-view
AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability

Trust and health

Maintenance

agentdojo
Steady (60%)
eval-view
Very active (96%)

Days since push

agentdojo
63d
eval-view
6d

Open issues (now)

agentdojo
41
eval-view
3

Owner type

agentdojo
Organization
eval-view
User

Full report

agentdojo
Trust report
eval-view
Trust report

Shared compatibility

  • Python · agentdojo: Python runtime · eval-view: Python runtime

Choose agentdojo if…

  • License: agentdojo is MIT, eval-view is Apache-2.0.
  • Pricing: Open-source under the MIT License. Some advanced features might require additional libraries or APIs..
  • Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM.
  • Tags unique to agentdojo: benchmark, large language models, prompt-injection, security.
  • AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.

When NOT to use agentdojo

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.

Choose eval-view if…

  • License: eval-view is Apache-2.0, agentdojo is MIT.
  • Pricing: Free to use under the terms of the Apache License, Version 2.0..
  • Requirements: Python environment is required for installation and usage.; Installation with pip: `pip install evalview`; Offline support means no live API keys necessary for the basic diff functionality..
  • Tags unique to eval-view: agent-benchmark, agent-evaluation, ai-agents, regression-testing.
  • eval-view ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • When you need to track and assess the behavior consistency of your AI agent across versions without involving live API calls.

When NOT to use eval-view

  • If you do not need to monitor specific behavioral characteristics such as tool call sequences and parameter consistency over time.
  • When real-time output quality evaluation is critical, as eval-view's offline diffing does not provide immediate feedback on output changes without an LLM judge.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: agentdojo 716 · eval-view 126 (synced Aug 5, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between agentdojo and eval-view?
agentdojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents. eval-view: Regression testing for AI agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose agentdojo over eval-view?
Choose agentdojo over eval-view when License: agentdojo is MIT, eval-view is Apache-2.0; Pricing: Open-source under the MIT License. Some advanced features might require additional libraries or APIs.; Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Tags unique to agentdojo: benchmark, large language models, prompt-injection, security; AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.
When should I choose eval-view over agentdojo?
Choose eval-view over agentdojo when License: eval-view is Apache-2.0, agentdojo is MIT; Pricing: Free to use under the terms of the Apache License, Version 2.0.; Requirements: Python environment is required for installation and usage.; Installation with pip: pip install evalview; Offline support means no live API keys necessary for the basic diff functionality.; Tags unique to eval-view: agent-benchmark, agent-evaluation, ai-agents, regression-testing; eval-view ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need to track and assess the behavior consistency of your AI agent across versions without involving live API calls.
When should I avoid agentdojo?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
When should I avoid eval-view?
If you do not need to monitor specific behavioral characteristics such as tool call sequences and parameter consistency over time. When real-time output quality evaluation is critical, as eval-view's offline diffing does not provide immediate feedback on output changes without an LLM judge.
Is agentdojo or eval-view more popular on GitHub?
agentdojo has more GitHub stars (716 vs 126). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are agentdojo and eval-view open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (agentdojo: MIT, eval-view: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to agentdojo or eval-view?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at agentdojo alternatives and eval-view alternatives (agentdojo markdown twin, eval-view markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, agentdojo or eval-view?
agentdojo: Steady. eval-view: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for agentdojo and eval-view?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: agentdojo trust report; eval-view trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.