Comparison
agentdojo vs baseline-defenses
Verdict
Pick agentdojo if agentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents; pick baseline-defenses if a toolkit for evaluating defenses against adversarial attacks on aligned language models, focusing on perplexity filter and paraphrase defense strategies.
Markdown twin · agentdojo alternatives · baseline-defenses alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
Trust & integrity
| Signal | agentdojo | baseline-defenses |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Steady (63d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Dormant (1013d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- agentdojo
- A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents
- baseline-defenses
- Research code for evaluating defenses against adversarial attacks on aligned language models
Stars
- agentdojo
- 716
- baseline-defenses
- 34
Forks
- agentdojo
- 188
- baseline-defenses
- 1
Open issues
- agentdojo
- 41
- baseline-defenses
- 0
Language
- agentdojo
- Python
- baseline-defenses
- Python
Adopt for
- agentdojo
- AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.
- baseline-defenses
- A toolkit for evaluating defenses against adversarial attacks on aligned language models, focusing on perplexity filter and paraphrase defense strategies.
Persona
- agentdojo
- -
- baseline-defenses
- -
Runtime
- agentdojo
- -
- baseline-defenses
- -
License
- agentdojo
- MIT
- baseline-defenses
- -
Last pushed
- agentdojo
- Jun 2, 2026
- baseline-defenses
- Oct 26, 2023
Categories
- agentdojo
- AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability
- baseline-defenses
- Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- agentdojo
- Steady (60%)
- baseline-defenses
- Dormant (18%)
Days since push
- agentdojo
- 63d
- baseline-defenses
- 1013d
Open issues (now)
- agentdojo
- 41
- baseline-defenses
- 0
Owner type
- agentdojo
- Organization
- baseline-defenses
- User
Full report
- agentdojo
- Trust report
- baseline-defenses
- Trust report
Choose agentdojo if…
- Pricing: Open-source under the MIT License. Some advanced features might require additional libraries or APIs..
- Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM.
- Tags unique to agentdojo: benchmark, large language models, prompt-injection, security.
- Also covers AI Agents.
- AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.
When NOT to use agentdojo
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
Choose baseline-defenses if…
- Tags unique to baseline-defenses: adversarial-attacks, defense strategies, paraphrase defense, perplexity filter.
- - When you need to evaluate the effectiveness of baseline defenses such as the perplexity filter or paraphrase defense in protecting aligned language models from adversarial attacks.
- Leaner open-issue backlog (0).
When NOT to use baseline-defenses
- - Do not use if you require comprehensive coverage of all possible defensive measures. This tool specifically lacks detailed code for retokenization defenses involving BPE-dropout.
- - If your scenario demands more advanced or specialized defense mechanisms beyond the scope of baseline strategies, this repository will fall short on delivering those.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (ethz-spylab/agentdojo) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (ethz-spylab/agentdojo) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Last push (ethz-spylab/agentdojo) · observed Jun 2, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 12, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (neelsjain/baseline-defenses) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (neelsjain/baseline-defenses) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Last push (neelsjain/baseline-defenses) · observed Oct 26, 2023
- License file (unknown) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 12, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: agentdojo 716 · baseline-defenses 34 (synced Aug 5, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between agentdojo and baseline-defenses?
- agentdojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents. baseline-defenses: Research code for evaluating defenses against adversarial attacks on aligned language models. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose agentdojo over baseline-defenses?
- Choose agentdojo over baseline-defenses when Pricing: Open-source under the MIT License. Some advanced features might require additional libraries or APIs.; Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Tags unique to agentdojo: benchmark, large language models, prompt-injection, security; Also covers AI Agents; AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.
- When should I choose baseline-defenses over agentdojo?
- Choose baseline-defenses over agentdojo when Tags unique to baseline-defenses: adversarial-attacks, defense strategies, paraphrase defense, perplexity filter; - When you need to evaluate the effectiveness of baseline defenses such as the perplexity filter or paraphrase defense in protecting aligned language models from adversarial attacks; Leaner open-issue backlog (0).
- When should I avoid agentdojo?
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
- When should I avoid baseline-defenses?
- - Do not use if you require comprehensive coverage of all possible defensive measures. This tool specifically lacks detailed code for retokenization defenses involving BPE-dropout. - If your scenario demands more advanced or specialized defense mechanisms beyond the scope of baseline strategies, this repository will fall short on delivering those.
- Is agentdojo or baseline-defenses more popular on GitHub?
- agentdojo has more GitHub stars (716 vs 34). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are agentdojo and baseline-defenses open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.
- Where can I find alternatives to agentdojo or baseline-defenses?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at agentdojo alternatives and baseline-defenses alternatives (agentdojo markdown twin, baseline-defenses markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, agentdojo or baseline-defenses?
- agentdojo: Steady. baseline-defenses: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for agentdojo and baseline-defenses?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: agentdojo trust report; baseline-defenses trust report.