Comparison
evidently vs promptfoo
Verdict
Pick evidently if evidently is an open-source framework for evaluating, testing, and monitoring AI systems and data pipelines, offering over 100 metrics for assessing data drift, data quality, and model performance; pick promptfoo if promptfoo is a TypeScript-based tool for evaluating and testing prompts, AI agents, and retrieval-augmented generation systems. It supports red teaming and vulnerability scanning for AI models.
Markdown twin · evidently alternatives · promptfoo alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026
15views this month
Trust & integrity
| Signal | evidently | promptfoo |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (6d since push) As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- evidently
- An open-source ML and LLM observability framework for evaluating, testing, and monitoring AI systems and data pipelines.
- promptfoo
- Test prompts, agents, and RAGs. Compare performance of various LLMs.
Stars
- evidently
- 7.9k
- promptfoo
- 25k
Forks
- evidently
- 919
- promptfoo
- 2.3k
Open issues
- evidently
- 304
- promptfoo
- 631
Language
- evidently
- Jupyter Notebook
- promptfoo
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- evidently
- Evidently is an open-source framework for evaluating, testing, and monitoring AI systems and data pipelines, offering over 100 metrics for assessing data drift, data quality, and model performance.
- promptfoo
- Promptfoo is a TypeScript-based tool for evaluating and testing prompts, AI agents, and retrieval-augmented generation systems. It supports red teaming and vulnerability scanning for AI models, with CI/CD integration.
Persona
- evidently
- -
- promptfoo
- -
Runtime
- evidently
- -
- promptfoo
- -
License
- evidently
- Evidently is available under the Apache-2.0 license, allowing for free use, modification, and distribution.
- promptfoo
- MIT
Last pushed
- evidently
- Sep 11, 2026
- promptfoo
- Sep 18, 2026
Categories
- evidently
- Evaluation & Observability
- promptfoo
- Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Days since push
- evidently
- 6d
- promptfoo
- 0d
Open issues (now)
- evidently
- 304
- promptfoo
- 631
Stars delta
- evidently
- +134 (30d)
- promptfoo
- +1.4k (30d)
Open issues delta
- evidently
- +9 (30d)
- promptfoo
- +150 (30d)
Full report
- evidently
- Trust report
- promptfoo
- Trust report
Typed relationship
Shared compatibility
- Python · evidently: Python runtime · promptfoo: Python runtime
Choose evidently if…
- evidently is primarily Jupyter Notebook; promptfoo is TypeScript.
- License: evidently is Apache-2.0, promptfoo is MIT.
- Pricing: Evidently is free and open-source, but users may incur costs related to hosting and infrastructure when deploying it..
- Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Evidently can be installed via pip or conda, making it accessible to users with different package management preferences..
- Evidently and Promptfoo both aim at observability for LLMs but differ in their methodologies, approach to evaluation, and the specific tools provided.
- Tags unique to evidently: data-drift, data-quality, data-science, data-validation.
- Use Evidently when you need to evaluate and monitor generative AI systems, as it supports a wide range of metrics specifically tailored for these applications.
When NOT to use evidently
- Avoid Evidently if your project requires real-time monitoring, as it is primarily designed for batch processing and post-deployment evaluation.
- Do not use Evidently if your team is not familiar with Jupyter Notebooks, as this is the primary interface for using the framework.
Choose promptfoo if…
- promptfoo is primarily TypeScript; evidently is Jupyter Notebook.
- License: promptfoo is MIT, evidently is Apache-2.0.
- Requirements: Requires Node.js >=22.22.0, with Node.js 24 LTS recommended.; API keys for most LLM providers are required and should be set as environment variables..
- Evidently and Promptfoo both aim at observability for LLMs but differ in their methodologies, approach to evaluation, and the specific tools provided.
- Tags unique to promptfoo: ci, ci-cd, cicd, evaluation.
- promptfoo ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you need to compare the performance of various LLMs such as GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, and more.
When NOT to use promptfoo
- If you are working with languages other than TypeScript, as Promptfoo is specifically designed for TypeScript environments.
- When you do not need to compare multiple LLMs and only require a simple prompt testing tool without advanced features like red teaming.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (evidentlyai/evidently) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (evidentlyai/evidently) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (evidentlyai/evidently) · observed Sep 11, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- GitHub stars (promptfoo/promptfoo) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (promptfoo/promptfoo) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (promptfoo/promptfoo) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Sep 18, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: evidently 7.9k · promptfoo 25k (synced Sep 20, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between evidently and promptfoo?
- evidently: An open-source ML and LLM observability framework for evaluating, testing, and monitoring AI systems and data pipelines.. promptfoo: Test prompts, agents, and RAGs. Compare performance of various LLMs.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose evidently over promptfoo?
- Choose evidently over promptfoo when evidently is primarily Jupyter Notebook; promptfoo is TypeScript; License: evidently is Apache-2.0, promptfoo is MIT; Pricing: Evidently is free and open-source, but users may incur costs related to hosting and infrastructure when deploying it.; Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Evidently can be installed via pip or conda, making it accessible to users with different package management preferences.; Evidently and Promptfoo both aim at observability for LLMs but differ in their methodologies, approach to evaluation, and the specific tools provided; Tags unique to evidently: data-drift, data-quality, data-science, data-validation; Use Evidently when you need to evaluate and monitor generative AI systems, as it supports a wide range of metrics specifically tailored for these applications.
- When should I choose promptfoo over evidently?
- Choose promptfoo over evidently when promptfoo is primarily TypeScript; evidently is Jupyter Notebook; License: promptfoo is MIT, evidently is Apache-2.0; Requirements: Requires Node.js >=22.22.0, with Node.js 24 LTS recommended.; API keys for most LLM providers are required and should be set as environment variables.; Evidently and Promptfoo both aim at observability for LLMs but differ in their methodologies, approach to evaluation, and the specific tools provided; Tags unique to promptfoo: ci, ci-cd, cicd, evaluation; promptfoo ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need to compare the performance of various LLMs such as GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, and more.
- When should I avoid evidently?
- Avoid Evidently if your project requires real-time monitoring, as it is primarily designed for batch processing and post-deployment evaluation. Do not use Evidently if your team is not familiar with Jupyter Notebooks, as this is the primary interface for using the framework.
- When should I avoid promptfoo?
- If you are working with languages other than TypeScript, as Promptfoo is specifically designed for TypeScript environments. When you do not need to compare multiple LLMs and only require a simple prompt testing tool without advanced features like red teaming.
- Is evidently or promptfoo more popular on GitHub?
- promptfoo has more GitHub stars (25,251 vs 7,924). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are evidently and promptfoo open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (evidently: Apache-2.0, promptfoo: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to evidently or promptfoo?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at evidently alternatives and promptfoo alternatives (evidently markdown twin, promptfoo markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, evidently or promptfoo?
- evidently: Very active. promptfoo: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for evidently and promptfoo?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: evidently trust report; promptfoo trust report.