Home/Compare/cc-switch vs paseo

Comparison

cc-switch vs paseo

Verdict

Pick cc-switch when cc-switch is primarily Rust; paseo is TypeScript; pick paseo when paseo is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust.

Markdown twin · cc-switch alternatives · paseo alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

cc-switch logo

cc-switch

farion1231/cc-switch

116kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
paseo logo

paseo

getpaseo/paseo

10kpushed Jul 15, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalcc-switchpaseo
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of 4d · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 4d · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 4d · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of today · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

cc-switch
A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for multiple AI agents
paseo
Orchestrate multiple coding agents from desktop and mobile

Stars

cc-switch
116k
paseo
10k

Forks

cc-switch
7.8k
paseo
1.0k

Open issues

cc-switch
1.9k
paseo
843

Language

cc-switch
Rust
paseo
TypeScript

Adopt for

cc-switch
cc-switch is a cross-platform desktop tool for managing AI agents written in Rust and TypeScript.
paseo
-

Persona

cc-switch
-
paseo
-

Runtime

cc-switch
-
paseo
-

License

cc-switch
cc-switch is distributed under the MIT License, allowing free modification and distribution as long as copyright notices are retained and changed licenses do not restrict usage.
paseo
Other

Last pushed

cc-switch
Jul 11, 2026
paseo
Jul 15, 2026

Categories

cc-switch
AI Agents, Developer Tools
paseo
AI Agents, Computer Vision, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Open issues (now)

cc-switch
1.9k
paseo
843

Owner type

cc-switch
User
paseo
Organization

Full report

cc-switch
Trust report

Choose cc-switch if…

  • cc-switch is primarily Rust; paseo is TypeScript.
  • License: cc-switch is MIT, paseo is Other.
  • Tags unique to cc-switch: desktop-app, hermes-agent, minimax, openclaw.
  • If you require seamless interaction with multiple AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI in a single interface.

When NOT to use cc-switch

  • If you are looking for a web-based or mobile app; cc-switch is strictly desktop-focused.
  • Requires manual curation of supported agents, limiting its utility if your primary agent is not included by default.
  • You prioritize the use of proprietary tools over open-source solutions.

Choose paseo if…

  • paseo is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust.
  • License: paseo is Other, cc-switch is MIT.
  • Tags unique to paseo: ade, agents, android, copilot.
  • Also covers Computer Vision.

When NOT to use paseo

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: cc-switch 116k · paseo 10k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between cc-switch and paseo?
cc-switch: A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for multiple AI agents. paseo: Orchestrate multiple coding agents from desktop and mobile. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose cc-switch over paseo?
Choose cc-switch over paseo when cc-switch is primarily Rust; paseo is TypeScript; License: cc-switch is MIT, paseo is Other; Tags unique to cc-switch: desktop-app, hermes-agent, minimax, openclaw; If you require seamless interaction with multiple AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI in a single interface.
When should I choose paseo over cc-switch?
Choose paseo over cc-switch when paseo is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust; License: paseo is Other, cc-switch is MIT; Tags unique to paseo: ade, agents, android, copilot; Also covers Computer Vision.
When should I avoid cc-switch?
If you are looking for a web-based or mobile app; cc-switch is strictly desktop-focused. Requires manual curation of supported agents, limiting its utility if your primary agent is not included by default. You prioritize the use of proprietary tools over open-source solutions.
When should I avoid paseo?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Is cc-switch or paseo more popular on GitHub?
cc-switch has more GitHub stars (115,863 vs 10,434). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are cc-switch and paseo open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (cc-switch: MIT, paseo: Other).
Where can I find alternatives to cc-switch or paseo?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cc-switch alternatives and paseo alternatives (cc-switch markdown twin, paseo markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, cc-switch or paseo?
cc-switch: Very active. paseo: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for cc-switch and paseo?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cc-switch trust report; paseo trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.