Home/Compare/cc-switch vs probity

Comparison

cc-switch vs probity

Verdict

Pick cc-switch when cc-switch is primarily Rust; probity is TypeScript; pick probity when probity is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust.

Markdown twin · cc-switch alternatives · probity alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

cc-switch logo

cc-switch

farion1231/cc-switch

116kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
probity logo

probity

nizos/probity

83pushed Jul 8, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalcc-switchprobity
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of 4d · github_public_v1
Very active (6d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 4d · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 4d · osv@v1
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-15
As of today · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

cc-switch
A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for multiple AI agents
probity
TDD enforcement and guardrails for Claude Code, Codex, and GitHub Copilot CLI

Stars

cc-switch
116k
probity
83

Forks

cc-switch
7.8k
probity
10

Open issues

cc-switch
1.9k
probity
4

Language

cc-switch
Rust
probity
TypeScript

Adopt for

cc-switch
cc-switch is a cross-platform desktop tool for managing AI agents written in Rust and TypeScript.
probity
-

Persona

cc-switch
-
probity
-

Runtime

cc-switch
-
probity
-

License

cc-switch
cc-switch is distributed under the MIT License, allowing free modification and distribution as long as copyright notices are retained and changed licenses do not restrict usage.
probity
MIT

Last pushed

cc-switch
Jul 11, 2026
probity
Jul 8, 2026

Categories

cc-switch
AI Agents, Developer Tools
probity
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Days since push

cc-switch
0d
probity
6d

Open issues (now)

cc-switch
1.9k
probity
4

OSV dependency advisories

cc-switch
No lockfile (source not queried)
probity
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-15

Full report

cc-switch
Trust report

Choose cc-switch if…

  • cc-switch is primarily Rust; probity is TypeScript.
  • Tags unique to cc-switch: desktop-app, hermes-agent, minimax, openclaw.
  • If you require seamless interaction with multiple AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI in a single interface.

When NOT to use cc-switch

  • If you are looking for a web-based or mobile app; cc-switch is strictly desktop-focused.
  • Requires manual curation of supported agents, limiting its utility if your primary agent is not included by default.
  • You prioritize the use of proprietary tools over open-source solutions.

Choose probity if…

  • probity is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust.
  • Tags unique to probity: agentic-coding, coding-agent, github-copilot, guardrails.
  • Leaner open-issue backlog (4).

When NOT to use probity

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: cc-switch 116k · probity 83 (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between cc-switch and probity?
cc-switch: A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for multiple AI agents. probity: TDD enforcement and guardrails for Claude Code, Codex, and GitHub Copilot CLI. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose cc-switch over probity?
Choose cc-switch over probity when cc-switch is primarily Rust; probity is TypeScript; Tags unique to cc-switch: desktop-app, hermes-agent, minimax, openclaw; If you require seamless interaction with multiple AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI in a single interface.
When should I choose probity over cc-switch?
Choose probity over cc-switch when probity is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust; Tags unique to probity: agentic-coding, coding-agent, github-copilot, guardrails; Leaner open-issue backlog (4).
When should I avoid cc-switch?
If you are looking for a web-based or mobile app; cc-switch is strictly desktop-focused. Requires manual curation of supported agents, limiting its utility if your primary agent is not included by default. You prioritize the use of proprietary tools over open-source solutions.
When should I avoid probity?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Is cc-switch or probity more popular on GitHub?
cc-switch has more GitHub stars (115,863 vs 83). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are cc-switch and probity open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (cc-switch: MIT, probity: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to cc-switch or probity?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cc-switch alternatives and probity alternatives (cc-switch markdown twin, probity markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, cc-switch or probity?
cc-switch: Very active. probity: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for cc-switch and probity?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cc-switch trust report; probity trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.