Home/Compare/cc-switch vs nuke

Comparison

cc-switch vs nuke

Verdict

Pick cc-switch when cc-switch is primarily Rust; nuke is C#; pick nuke when nuke is primarily C#; cc-switch is Rust.

Markdown twin · cc-switch alternatives · nuke alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

cc-switch logo

cc-switch

farion1231/cc-switch

116kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
nuke logo

nuke

nuke-build/nuke

3.7kpushed Dec 2, 2025

Trust & integrity

Signalcc-switchnuke
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of 4d · github_public_v1
Slowing (225d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 4d · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 4d · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of today · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

cc-switch
A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for multiple AI agents
nuke
🏗 The AKEless Build System for C#/.NET

Stars

cc-switch
116k
nuke
3.7k

Forks

cc-switch
7.8k
nuke
455

Open issues

cc-switch
1.9k
nuke
121

Language

cc-switch
Rust
nuke
C#

Adopt for

cc-switch
cc-switch is a cross-platform desktop tool for managing AI agents written in Rust and TypeScript.
nuke
-

Persona

cc-switch
-
nuke
-

Runtime

cc-switch
-
nuke
-

License

cc-switch
cc-switch is distributed under the MIT License, allowing free modification and distribution as long as copyright notices are retained and changed licenses do not restrict usage.
nuke
MIT

Last pushed

cc-switch
Jul 11, 2026
nuke
Dec 2, 2025

Categories

cc-switch
AI Agents, Developer Tools
nuke
AI Agents, Computer Vision, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

cc-switch
Very active (96%)
nuke
Slowing (36%)

Days since push

cc-switch
0d
nuke
225d

Open issues (now)

cc-switch
1.9k
nuke
121

Owner type

cc-switch
User
nuke
Organization

Full report

cc-switch
Trust report

Choose cc-switch if…

  • cc-switch is primarily Rust; nuke is C#.
  • Tags unique to cc-switch: claude code, codex, desktop-app, hermes-agent.
  • If you require seamless interaction with multiple AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI in a single interface.

When NOT to use cc-switch

  • If you are looking for a web-based or mobile app; cc-switch is strictly desktop-focused.
  • Requires manual curation of supported agents, limiting its utility if your primary agent is not included by default.
  • You prioritize the use of proprietary tools over open-source solutions.

Choose nuke if…

  • nuke is primarily C#; cc-switch is Rust.
  • Tags unique to nuke: build-automation, c#, continuous-integration, nuke.
  • Also covers Computer Vision.
  • nuke ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

When NOT to use nuke

  • Last GitHub push was 225 days ago (slowing maintenance, Dec 2, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on nuke.
  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: cc-switch 116k · nuke 3.7k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between cc-switch and nuke?
cc-switch: A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for multiple AI agents. nuke: 🏗 The AKEless Build System for C#/.NET. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose cc-switch over nuke?
Choose cc-switch over nuke when cc-switch is primarily Rust; nuke is C#; Tags unique to cc-switch: claude code, codex, desktop-app, hermes-agent; If you require seamless interaction with multiple AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI in a single interface.
When should I choose nuke over cc-switch?
Choose nuke over cc-switch when nuke is primarily C#; cc-switch is Rust; Tags unique to nuke: build-automation, c#, continuous-integration, nuke; Also covers Computer Vision; nuke ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When should I avoid cc-switch?
If you are looking for a web-based or mobile app; cc-switch is strictly desktop-focused. Requires manual curation of supported agents, limiting its utility if your primary agent is not included by default. You prioritize the use of proprietary tools over open-source solutions.
When should I avoid nuke?
Last GitHub push was 225 days ago (slowing maintenance, Dec 2, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on nuke. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Is cc-switch or nuke more popular on GitHub?
cc-switch has more GitHub stars (115,863 vs 3,748). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are cc-switch and nuke open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (cc-switch: MIT, nuke: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to cc-switch or nuke?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cc-switch alternatives and nuke alternatives (cc-switch markdown twin, nuke markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, cc-switch or nuke?
cc-switch: Very active. nuke: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for cc-switch and nuke?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cc-switch trust report; nuke trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.