Comparison
lamda vs stealth-browser-mcp
Verdict
Pick lamda if lamda is an Android full-stack device control platform with tools for remote desktop control via WebRTC/H264, UI/OCR/image-matching automation, and built-in Frida; pick stealth-browser-mcp if stealth-Browser-MCP is an AI-powered tool for browser automation that focuses on evading anti-bot systems while automating human-like interactions.
Markdown twin · lamda alternatives · stealth-browser-mcp alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 15, 2026
16views this month
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | lamda | stealth-browser-mcp |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active (15d since push) As of Sep 15, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Steady (32d since push) As of Aug 26, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 15, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of Aug 26, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1 | Published findings As of Sep 13, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- lamda
- Android full-stack device control platform with remote access and automation capabilities
- stealth-browser-mcp
- AI-powered browser automation that bypasses anti-bot systems
Stars
- lamda
- 8.3k
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 1.7k
Forks
- lamda
- 1.1k
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 247
Open issues
- lamda
- 45
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 2
Language
- lamda
- Python
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Python
Adopt for
- lamda
- lamda is an Android full-stack device control platform with tools for remote desktop control via WebRTC/H264, UI/OCR/image-matching automation, and built-in Frida.
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Stealth-Browser-MCP is an AI-powered tool for browser automation that focuses on evading anti-bot systems while automating human-like interactions.
Persona
- lamda
- -
- stealth-browser-mcp
- -
Runtime
- lamda
- -
- stealth-browser-mcp
- -
License
- lamda
- MIT
- stealth-browser-mcp
- MIT
Last pushed
- lamda
- Aug 30, 2026
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Jul 24, 2026
Categories
- lamda
- AI Agents, Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability
- stealth-browser-mcp
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
Trust and health
Maintenance
- lamda
- Active (82%)
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Steady (60%)
Days since push
- lamda
- 15d
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 32d
Open issues (now)
- lamda
- 45
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 2
Stars delta
- lamda
- +176 (30d)
- stealth-browser-mcp
- +92 (30d)
Open issues delta
- lamda
- +4 (30d)
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 0 (30d)
Owner type
- lamda
- Organization
- stealth-browser-mcp
- User
OSV dependency advisories
- lamda
- No lockfile (source not queried)
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Published findings
Full report
- lamda
- Trust report
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Trust report
Choose lamda if…
- Pricing: Available under the MIT license; includes paid support options not covered in open-source documentation..
- Tags unique to lamda: adb, agents, android, appium.
- Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
- When you need a comprehensive set of over 160 APIs optimized for multi-device cluster management
When NOT to use lamda
- If your project strictly avoids open-source tools under the MIT license, favoring proprietary or different licensing schemes
- When you do not require extensive networking options such as proxy/VPN/P2P within the toolset
- For projects that need fewer API integrations or lighter control capabilities over remote devices
Choose stealth-browser-mcp if…
- Tags unique to stealth-browser-mcp: ai-agents, anti-bot-bypass, browser-automation, web-scraping.
- stealth-browser-mcp ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you need to automate tasks that require bypassing advanced anti-bot detection mechanisms.
When NOT to use stealth-browser-mcp
- If your browser automation requirements do not involve evading sophisticated anti-bot systems or mimicking human behavior closely enough to trick such defenses.
- When the tool's specific approach, which includes AI-generated network hooks and UI cloning, is unnecessary for task completion because simpler solutions can suffice.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (firerpa/lamda) · observed Sep 15, 2026
- GitHub forks (firerpa/lamda) · observed Sep 15, 2026
- Last push (firerpa/lamda) · observed Aug 30, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Sep 15, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- GitHub stars (vibheksoni/stealth-browser-mcp) · observed Aug 26, 2026
- GitHub forks (vibheksoni/stealth-browser-mcp) · observed Aug 26, 2026
- Last push (vibheksoni/stealth-browser-mcp) · observed Jul 24, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Aug 26, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Sep 13, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: lamda 8.3k · stealth-browser-mcp 1.7k (synced Sep 15, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between lamda and stealth-browser-mcp?
- lamda: Android full-stack device control platform with remote access and automation capabilities. stealth-browser-mcp: AI-powered browser automation that bypasses anti-bot systems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose lamda over stealth-browser-mcp?
- Choose lamda over stealth-browser-mcp when Pricing: Available under the MIT license; includes paid support options not covered in open-source documentation.; Tags unique to lamda: adb, agents, android, appium; Also covers Evaluation & Observability; When you need a comprehensive set of over 160 APIs optimized for multi-device cluster management.
- When should I choose stealth-browser-mcp over lamda?
- Choose stealth-browser-mcp over lamda when Tags unique to stealth-browser-mcp: ai-agents, anti-bot-bypass, browser-automation, web-scraping; stealth-browser-mcp ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need to automate tasks that require bypassing advanced anti-bot detection mechanisms.
- When should I avoid lamda?
- If your project strictly avoids open-source tools under the MIT license, favoring proprietary or different licensing schemes When you do not require extensive networking options such as proxy/VPN/P2P within the toolset For projects that need fewer API integrations or lighter control capabilities over remote devices
- When should I avoid stealth-browser-mcp?
- If your browser automation requirements do not involve evading sophisticated anti-bot systems or mimicking human behavior closely enough to trick such defenses. When the tool's specific approach, which includes AI-generated network hooks and UI cloning, is unnecessary for task completion because simpler solutions can suffice.
- Is lamda or stealth-browser-mcp more popular on GitHub?
- lamda has more GitHub stars (8,297 vs 1,651). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are lamda and stealth-browser-mcp open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (lamda: MIT, stealth-browser-mcp: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to lamda or stealth-browser-mcp?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at lamda alternatives and stealth-browser-mcp alternatives (lamda markdown twin, stealth-browser-mcp markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, lamda or stealth-browser-mcp?
- lamda: Active. stealth-browser-mcp: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for lamda and stealth-browser-mcp?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: lamda trust report; stealth-browser-mcp trust report.