Comparison
LLMDebugger vs PurpleLlama
Verdict
Pick LLMDebugger if lLMDebugger offers step-by-step verification of runtime execution for large language models; pick PurpleLlama if purpleLlama provides tools to enhance the security and trust of large language models using MIT licenses for benchmarks and community-specific licenses for safeguard components.
Markdown twin · LLMDebugger alternatives · PurpleLlama alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | LLMDebugger | PurpleLlama |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (693d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Active (8d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11 As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- LLMDebugger
- A Large Language Model Debugger verifying runtime execution step by step
- PurpleLlama
- Set of tools to assess and improve LLM security
Stars
- LLMDebugger
- 587
- PurpleLlama
- 4.3k
Forks
- LLMDebugger
- 56
- PurpleLlama
- 766
Open issues
- LLMDebugger
- 5
- PurpleLlama
- 80
Language
- LLMDebugger
- Python
- PurpleLlama
- Python
Adopt for
- LLMDebugger
- LLMDebugger offers step-by-step verification of runtime execution for large language models.
- PurpleLlama
- PurpleLlama provides tools to enhance the security and trust of large language models using MIT licenses for benchmarks and community-specific licenses for safeguard components.
Persona
- LLMDebugger
- -
- PurpleLlama
- -
Runtime
- LLMDebugger
- -
- PurpleLlama
- -
License
- LLMDebugger
- The LLMDebugger is distributed under the Apache-2.0 license.
- PurpleLlama
- Other
Last pushed
- LLMDebugger
- Sep 10, 2024
- PurpleLlama
- Jul 27, 2026
Categories
- LLMDebugger
- Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability
- PurpleLlama
- Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- LLMDebugger
- Dormant (18%)
- PurpleLlama
- Active (82%)
Days since push
- LLMDebugger
- 693d
- PurpleLlama
- 8d
Open issues (now)
- LLMDebugger
- 5
- PurpleLlama
- 80
Owner type
- LLMDebugger
- User
- PurpleLlama
- Organization
OSV dependency advisories
- LLMDebugger
- No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
- PurpleLlama
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- LLMDebugger
- Trust report
- PurpleLlama
- Trust report
Choose LLMDebugger if…
- License: LLMDebugger is Apache-2.0, PurpleLlama is Other.
- Pricing: Free for use, based on its open-source nature with an Apache-2.0 license..
- Tags unique to LLMDebugger: acl'24, llm debugging, python debugger for ai, runtime verification.
- When detailed step-by-step inspection of the runtime behavior of large language models is required, LLMDebugger can provide precise insights into each execution phase.
When NOT to use LLMDebugger
- Avoid using if you are only interested in higher-level performance metrics rather than the intricate details of runtime behavior, as LLMDebugger emphasizes step-by-step execution.
- Not recommended for teams lacking experience with Python or specific to this tool's installation and usage workflow that involves setting up a Conda environment.
Choose PurpleLlama if…
- License: PurpleLlama is Other, LLMDebugger is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to PurpleLlama: benchmarks, evaluations, llm security tools, security.
- When you need permissive licenses that fit both research and commercial purposes
When NOT to use PurpleLlama
- If your project requires consistent licensing across all components under one standard license like GPL or Apache-2.0
- When you prefer not to adhere to the Llama Community Licenses for safeguard functionalities
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (FloridSleeves/LLMDebugger) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (FloridSleeves/LLMDebugger) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Last push (FloridSleeves/LLMDebugger) · observed Sep 10, 2024
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (meta-llama/PurpleLlama) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (meta-llama/PurpleLlama) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Last push (meta-llama/PurpleLlama) · observed Jul 27, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: LLMDebugger 587 · PurpleLlama 4.3k (synced Aug 5, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between LLMDebugger and PurpleLlama?
- LLMDebugger: A Large Language Model Debugger verifying runtime execution step by step. PurpleLlama: Set of tools to assess and improve LLM security. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose LLMDebugger over PurpleLlama?
- Choose LLMDebugger over PurpleLlama when License: LLMDebugger is Apache-2.0, PurpleLlama is Other; Pricing: Free for use, based on its open-source nature with an Apache-2.0 license.; Tags unique to LLMDebugger: acl'24, llm debugging, python debugger for ai, runtime verification; When detailed step-by-step inspection of the runtime behavior of large language models is required, LLMDebugger can provide precise insights into each execution phase.
- When should I choose PurpleLlama over LLMDebugger?
- Choose PurpleLlama over LLMDebugger when License: PurpleLlama is Other, LLMDebugger is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to PurpleLlama: benchmarks, evaluations, llm security tools, security; When you need permissive licenses that fit both research and commercial purposes.
- When should I avoid LLMDebugger?
- Avoid using if you are only interested in higher-level performance metrics rather than the intricate details of runtime behavior, as LLMDebugger emphasizes step-by-step execution. Not recommended for teams lacking experience with Python or specific to this tool's installation and usage workflow that involves setting up a Conda environment.
- When should I avoid PurpleLlama?
- If your project requires consistent licensing across all components under one standard license like GPL or Apache-2.0 When you prefer not to adhere to the Llama Community Licenses for safeguard functionalities
- Is LLMDebugger or PurpleLlama more popular on GitHub?
- PurpleLlama has more GitHub stars (4,330 vs 587). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are LLMDebugger and PurpleLlama open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (LLMDebugger: Apache-2.0, PurpleLlama: Other).
- Where can I find alternatives to LLMDebugger or PurpleLlama?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at LLMDebugger alternatives and PurpleLlama alternatives (LLMDebugger markdown twin, PurpleLlama markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, LLMDebugger or PurpleLlama?
- LLMDebugger: Dormant. PurpleLlama: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for LLMDebugger and PurpleLlama?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: LLMDebugger trust report; PurpleLlama trust report.