Home/Compare/chain-of-thought-hub vs simple-evals

Comparison

chain-of-thought-hub vs simple-evals

Verdict

Pick chain-of-thought-hub when chain-of-thought-hub is primarily Jupyter Notebook; simple-evals is Python; pick simple-evals when simple-evals is primarily Python; chain-of-thought-hub is Jupyter Notebook.

Markdown twin · chain-of-thought-hub alternatives · simple-evals alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

chain-of-thought-hub logo

chain-of-thought-hub

FranxYao/chain-of-thought-hub

2.8kpushed Aug 4, 2024
vs
simple-evals logo

simple-evals

openai/simple-evals

4.6kpushed Apr 22, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalchain-of-thought-hubsimple-evals
Maintenance
Dormant (706d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Steady (79d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No lockfile
As of today · none

Tagline

chain-of-thought-hub
Benchmarking large language models' complex reasoning ability with chain-of-thought prompting
simple-evals
simple-evals

Stars

chain-of-thought-hub
2.8k
simple-evals
4.6k

Forks

chain-of-thought-hub
144
simple-evals
493

Open issues

chain-of-thought-hub
27
simple-evals
56

Language

chain-of-thought-hub
Jupyter Notebook
simple-evals
Python

Adopt for

chain-of-thought-hub
Chain-of-Thought Hub measures the performance of large language models (LLMs) on complex tasks by using carefully selected datasets across various domains such as math, science, coding, and knowledge. It evaluates if LLM
simple-evals
-

Persona

chain-of-thought-hub
-
simple-evals
-

Runtime

chain-of-thought-hub
-
simple-evals
-

License

chain-of-thought-hub
The MIT license permits the use of Chain-of-Thought Hub in both open source and commercial projects with acknowledgment.
simple-evals
MIT

Last pushed

chain-of-thought-hub
Aug 4, 2024
simple-evals
Apr 22, 2026

Categories

chain-of-thought-hub
Evaluation & Observability
simple-evals
LLM Frameworks, Evaluation & Observability

Trust and health

Maintenance

chain-of-thought-hub
Dormant (18%)
simple-evals
Steady (60%)

Days since push

chain-of-thought-hub
706d
simple-evals
79d

Open issues (now)

chain-of-thought-hub
27
simple-evals
56

Owner type

chain-of-thought-hub
User
simple-evals
Organization

Full report

chain-of-thought-hub
Trust report
simple-evals
Trust report

Choose chain-of-thought-hub if…

  • chain-of-thought-hub is primarily Jupyter Notebook; simple-evals is Python.
  • Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Chain-of-Thought Hub is designed to be integrated into environments for evaluating LLMs using Jupyter Notebooks.
  • Tags unique to chain-of-thought-hub: complex reasoning, chain-of-thought prompting, llm-benchmarking.
  • Use Chain-of-Thought Hub when you need to benchmark smaller LLMs against larger ones for complex reasoning abilities.

When NOT to use chain-of-thought-hub

  • Do not use Chain-of-Thought Hub if your focus is on general conversational capabilities rather than specific, challenging problem-solving tasks.
  • Avoid this tool if you are primarily interested in simpler language processing tasks that do not involve chain-of-thought prompting or complex datasets.

Choose simple-evals if…

  • simple-evals is primarily Python; chain-of-thought-hub is Jupyter Notebook.
  • Tags unique to simple-evals: python.
  • Also covers LLM Frameworks.

When NOT to use simple-evals

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: chain-of-thought-hub 2.8k · simple-evals 4.6k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between chain-of-thought-hub and simple-evals?
chain-of-thought-hub: Benchmarking large language models' complex reasoning ability with chain-of-thought prompting. simple-evals: simple-evals. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose chain-of-thought-hub over simple-evals?
Choose chain-of-thought-hub over simple-evals when chain-of-thought-hub is primarily Jupyter Notebook; simple-evals is Python; Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Chain-of-Thought Hub is designed to be integrated into environments for evaluating LLMs using Jupyter Notebooks; Tags unique to chain-of-thought-hub: complex reasoning, chain-of-thought prompting, llm-benchmarking; Use Chain-of-Thought Hub when you need to benchmark smaller LLMs against larger ones for complex reasoning abilities.
When should I choose simple-evals over chain-of-thought-hub?
Choose simple-evals over chain-of-thought-hub when simple-evals is primarily Python; chain-of-thought-hub is Jupyter Notebook; Tags unique to simple-evals: python; Also covers LLM Frameworks.
When should I avoid chain-of-thought-hub?
Do not use Chain-of-Thought Hub if your focus is on general conversational capabilities rather than specific, challenging problem-solving tasks. Avoid this tool if you are primarily interested in simpler language processing tasks that do not involve chain-of-thought prompting or complex datasets.
When should I avoid simple-evals?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
Is chain-of-thought-hub or simple-evals more popular on GitHub?
simple-evals has more GitHub stars (4,565 vs 2,777). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are chain-of-thought-hub and simple-evals open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (chain-of-thought-hub: MIT, simple-evals: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to chain-of-thought-hub or simple-evals?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at chain-of-thought-hub alternatives and simple-evals alternatives (chain-of-thought-hub markdown twin, simple-evals markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, chain-of-thought-hub or simple-evals?
chain-of-thought-hub: Dormant. simple-evals: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for chain-of-thought-hub and simple-evals?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: chain-of-thought-hub trust report; simple-evals trust report.