Home/Compare/CosyVoice vs quillman

Comparison

CosyVoice vs quillman

Verdict

Pick CosyVoice when license: CosyVoice is Apache-2.0, quillman is MIT; pick quillman when license: quillman is MIT, CosyVoice is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · CosyVoice alternatives · quillman alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

CosyVoice logo

CosyVoice

FunAudioLLM/CosyVoice

22kpushed May 25, 2026
vs
quillman logo

quillman

modal-labs/quillman

1.2kpushed May 28, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalCosyVoicequillman
Maintenance
Steady (46d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Steady (44d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No lockfile
As of today · none

Tagline

CosyVoice
Multi-lingual large voice generation model with full-stack abilities for inference, training and deployment.
quillman
A voice chat app

Stars

CosyVoice
22k
quillman
1.2k

Forks

CosyVoice
2.5k
quillman
158

Open issues

CosyVoice
767
quillman
4

Language

CosyVoice
Python
quillman
Python

Adopt for

CosyVoice
CosyVoice is a Python-based multi-lingual large voice generation model. It supports extensive capabilities including fine-tuning, TTS (Text-To-Speech), and natural language generation.
quillman
-

Persona

CosyVoice
-
quillman
-

Runtime

CosyVoice
-
quillman
-

License

CosyVoice
Apache-2.0
quillman
MIT

Last pushed

CosyVoice
May 25, 2026
quillman
May 28, 2026

Categories

CosyVoice
Model Training, Speech & Audio, Inference & Serving
quillman
Speech & Audio

Trust and health

Days since push

CosyVoice
46d
quillman
44d

Open issues (now)

CosyVoice
767
quillman
4

Full report

CosyVoice
Trust report
quillman
Trust report

Choose CosyVoice if…

  • License: CosyVoice is Apache-2.0, quillman is MIT.
  • Tags unique to CosyVoice: cantonese, audio-generation, chinese, english.
  • Also covers Model Training, Inference & Serving.
  • When you need support for multiple languages like Cantonese, Chinese, English, Japanese, and Korean.

When NOT to use CosyVoice

  • If your project specifically requires fine-tuned performance in languages not supported by CosyVoice such as Arabic or Spanish.
  • When strict real-time speech synthesis requirements are essential, as CosyVoice may face delays depending on the environment's computational power and model complexity.

Choose quillman if…

  • License: quillman is MIT, CosyVoice is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to quillman: ai, speech-to-text, python, serverless.
  • More recently updated (last pushed May 28, 2026).

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: CosyVoice 22k · quillman 1.2k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between CosyVoice and quillman?
CosyVoice: Multi-lingual large voice generation model with full-stack abilities for inference, training and deployment.. quillman: A voice chat app. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose CosyVoice over quillman?
Choose CosyVoice over quillman when License: CosyVoice is Apache-2.0, quillman is MIT; Tags unique to CosyVoice: cantonese, audio-generation, chinese, english; Also covers Model Training, Inference & Serving; When you need support for multiple languages like Cantonese, Chinese, English, Japanese, and Korean.
When should I choose quillman over CosyVoice?
Choose quillman over CosyVoice when License: quillman is MIT, CosyVoice is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to quillman: ai, speech-to-text, python, serverless; More recently updated (last pushed May 28, 2026).
When should I avoid CosyVoice?
If your project specifically requires fine-tuned performance in languages not supported by CosyVoice such as Arabic or Spanish. When strict real-time speech synthesis requirements are essential, as CosyVoice may face delays depending on the environment's computational power and model complexity.
Is CosyVoice or quillman more popular on GitHub?
CosyVoice has more GitHub stars (22,089 vs 1,210). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are CosyVoice and quillman open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (CosyVoice: Apache-2.0, quillman: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to CosyVoice or quillman?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at CosyVoice alternatives and quillman alternatives (CosyVoice markdown twin, quillman markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, CosyVoice or quillman?
CosyVoice: Steady. quillman: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for CosyVoice and quillman?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: CosyVoice trust report; quillman trust report.