GraphCanon
Home/Compare/qabot vs agents

Comparison

qabot vs agents

Verdict

Pick qabot when license: qabot is Apache-2.0, agents is MIT; pick agents when license: agents is MIT, qabot is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · qabot alternatives · agents alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

qabot logo

qabot

hardbyte/qabot

★ 245pushed Mar 5, 2025
vs
agents logo

agents

wshobson/agents

★ 38kpushed Jul 8, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalqabotagents
Maintenance
Dormant (492d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (2d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest
qabot trust reportagents trust reportTrust methodology

Tagline

qabot
CLI based natural language queries on local or remote data
agents
Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for various AI agents

Stars

qabot
245
agents
38k

Forks

qabot
20
agents
4.0k

Open issues

qabot
2
agents
1

Language

qabot
Python
agents
Python

Adopt for

qabot
-
agents
The agents tool is a marketplace for plugins that enhances multiple AI agents, offering integration and management capabilities across several platforms, including Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot

Persona

qabot
-
agents
-

Runtime

qabot
-
agents
-

License

qabot
Apache-2.0
agents
MIT

Last pushed

qabot
Mar 5, 2025
agents
Jul 8, 2026

Categories

qabot
Developer Tools
agents
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

qabot
Dormant (18%)
agents
Very active (96%)

Days since push

qabot
492d
agents
2d

Open issues (now)

qabot
2
agents
1

Security scan

qabot
No lockfile
agents
No MCP manifest

Full report

qabot
Trust report
agents
Trust report

Choose qabot if…

  • License: qabot is Apache-2.0, agents is MIT.
  • Tags unique to qabot: python.
  • qabot ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

When NOT to use qabot

  • Last GitHub push was 493 days ago (dormant maintenance, Mar 5, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on qabot.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
GitHubDetails

Choose agents if…

  • License: agents is MIT, qabot is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to agents: agent-skills, workflows, agentic-ai, prompt-engineering.
  • Also covers AI Agents.
  • You are working specifically within the ecosystems of Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, or Gemini CLI, as it provides tailored plugins for these environments

When NOT to use agents

  • You are working solely within a niche environment that isn't one of the supported platforms (like Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc.) because it may not offer compatible plugins or extensive support
  • Your project requirements do not include interoperability between multiple AI agents and you only need to leverage functionalities from a single AI agent with a robust in-built plugin ecosystem
GitHubDetails

Explore

qabot trust report →agents trust report →Developer Tools category →AI Agents category →All comparisonsStack workflowsTrending tools

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: qabot 245 · agents 38k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between qabot and agents?
qabot: CLI based natural language queries on local or remote data. agents: Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for various AI agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose qabot over agents?
Choose qabot over agents when License: qabot is Apache-2.0, agents is MIT; Tags unique to qabot: python; qabot ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When should I choose agents over qabot?
Choose agents over qabot when License: agents is MIT, qabot is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to agents: agent-skills, workflows, agentic-ai, prompt-engineering; Also covers AI Agents; You are working specifically within the ecosystems of Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, or Gemini CLI, as it provides tailored plugins for these environments.
When should I avoid qabot?
Last GitHub push was 493 days ago (dormant maintenance, Mar 5, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on qabot. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid agents?
You are working solely within a niche environment that isn't one of the supported platforms (like Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc.) because it may not offer compatible plugins or extensive support Your project requirements do not include interoperability between multiple AI agents and you only need to leverage functionalities from a single AI agent with a robust in-built plugin ecosystem
Is qabot or agents more popular on GitHub?
agents has more GitHub stars (37,779 vs 245). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are qabot and agents open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (qabot: Apache-2.0, agents: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to qabot or agents?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at qabot alternatives and agents alternatives (qabot markdown twin, agents markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, qabot or agents?
qabot: Dormant. agents: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for qabot and agents?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: qabot trust report; agents trust report.