Comparison
LlamaFactory vs human-eval
Verdict
Pick LlamaFactory when license: LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0, human-eval is MIT; pick human-eval when license: human-eval is MIT, LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0.
Markdown twin · LlamaFactory alternatives · human-eval alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | LlamaFactory | human-eval |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Dormant (540d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | No lockfile As of today · none | No criticals As of today · osv@v1 |
Tagline
- LlamaFactory
- Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs
- human-eval
- Code for the paper "Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code"
Stars
- LlamaFactory
- 73k
- human-eval
- 3.3k
Forks
- LlamaFactory
- 8.9k
- human-eval
- 449
Open issues
- LlamaFactory
- 1.1k
- human-eval
- 42
Language
- LlamaFactory
- Python
- human-eval
- Python
Adopt for
- LlamaFactory
- LlamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization.
- human-eval
- -
Persona
- LlamaFactory
- -
- human-eval
- -
Runtime
- LlamaFactory
- -
- human-eval
- -
License
- LlamaFactory
- Apache-2.0
- human-eval
- MIT
Last pushed
- LlamaFactory
- Jul 10, 2026
- human-eval
- Jan 17, 2025
Categories
- LlamaFactory
- LLM Frameworks, Model Training
- human-eval
- Model Training, LLM Frameworks, Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- LlamaFactory
- Very active (96%)
- human-eval
- Dormant (18%)
Days since push
- LlamaFactory
- 0d
- human-eval
- 540d
Open issues (now)
- LlamaFactory
- 1.1k
- human-eval
- 42
Owner type
- LlamaFactory
- User
- human-eval
- Organization
Security scan
- LlamaFactory
- No lockfile
- human-eval
- No criticals
Full report
- LlamaFactory
- Trust report
- human-eval
- Trust report
Choose LlamaFactory if…
- License: LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0, human-eval is MIT.
- Tags unique to LlamaFactory: gemma, fine-tuning, deepseek, ai.
- When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA.
When NOT to use LlamaFactory
- When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory.
- If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa
Choose human-eval if…
- License: human-eval is MIT, LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to human-eval: python.
- Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
When NOT to use human-eval
- Last GitHub push was 540 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jan 17, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on human-eval.
- Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (hiyouga/LlamaFactory) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (hiyouga/LlamaFactory) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (hiyouga/LlamaFactory) · observed Jul 10, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (openai/human-eval) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (openai/human-eval) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (openai/human-eval) · observed Jan 17, 2025
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: LlamaFactory 73k · human-eval 3.3k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between LlamaFactory and human-eval?
- LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs. human-eval: Code for the paper "Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code". See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose LlamaFactory over human-eval?
- Choose LlamaFactory over human-eval when License: LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0, human-eval is MIT; Tags unique to LlamaFactory: gemma, fine-tuning, deepseek, ai; When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA.
- When should I choose human-eval over LlamaFactory?
- Choose human-eval over LlamaFactory when License: human-eval is MIT, LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to human-eval: python; Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
- When should I avoid LlamaFactory?
- When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory. If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa
- When should I avoid human-eval?
- Last GitHub push was 540 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jan 17, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on human-eval. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
- Is LlamaFactory or human-eval more popular on GitHub?
- LlamaFactory has more GitHub stars (73,157 vs 3,294). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are LlamaFactory and human-eval open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (LlamaFactory: Apache-2.0, human-eval: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to LlamaFactory or human-eval?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at LlamaFactory alternatives and human-eval alternatives (LlamaFactory markdown twin, human-eval markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, LlamaFactory or human-eval?
- LlamaFactory: Very active. human-eval: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for LlamaFactory and human-eval?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: LlamaFactory trust report; human-eval trust report.