Home/Compare/litegraph.js vs awesome

Comparison

litegraph.js vs awesome

Verdict

Pick litegraph.js when license: litegraph.js is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0; pick awesome when license: awesome is CC0-1.0, litegraph.js is MIT.

Markdown twin · litegraph.js alternatives · awesome alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

litegraph.js logo

litegraph.js

jagenjo/litegraph.js

8.1kpushed Aug 1, 2024
vs
awesome logo

awesome

sindresorhus/awesome

484kpushed Jun 30, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signallitegraph.jsawesome
Maintenance
Dormant (713d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Active (11d since push)
As of 3d · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 3d · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of today · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 3d · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

litegraph.js
A graph node engine and editor written in Javascript similar to PD or UDK Blueprints, comes with its own editor in HTML5 Canvas2D. The engine can run client side or server side using Node. It allows t
awesome
😎 Awesome lists about all kinds of interesting topics

Stars

litegraph.js
8.1k
awesome
484k

Forks

litegraph.js
838
awesome
36k

Open issues

litegraph.js
148
awesome
92

Language

litegraph.js
JavaScript
awesome
-

Adopt for

litegraph.js
-
awesome
A curated collection of resources on a variety of technological topics, emphasizing hardware and robotics.

Persona

litegraph.js
-
awesome
-

Runtime

litegraph.js
-
awesome
-

License

litegraph.js
MIT
awesome
CC0-1.0

Last pushed

litegraph.js
Aug 1, 2024
awesome
Jun 30, 2026

Categories

litegraph.js
Developer Tools
awesome
Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

litegraph.js
Dormant (18%)
awesome
Active (82%)

Days since push

litegraph.js
713d
awesome
11d

Open issues (now)

litegraph.js
148
awesome
92

Full report

litegraph.js
Trust report

Choose litegraph.js if…

  • License: litegraph.js is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0.
  • Tags unique to litegraph.js: blueprints, canvas2d, editor, graph.

When NOT to use litegraph.js

  • Last GitHub push was 713 days ago (dormant maintenance, Aug 1, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on litegraph.js.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Choose awesome if…

  • License: awesome is CC0-1.0, litegraph.js is MIT.
  • Tags unique to awesome: awesome, awesome-list, lists, resources.
  • When you need well-organized access to diverse technical subjects from IoT to robotics

When NOT to use awesome

  • If seeking specific coding frameworks or libraries for software development rather than hardware-focused resources
  • In scenarios requiring real-time interactive support or forums, as the content is static lists without active discussion

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: litegraph.js 8.1k · awesome 484k (synced Jul 15, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between litegraph.js and awesome?
litegraph.js: A graph node engine and editor written in Javascript similar to PD or UDK Blueprints, comes with its own editor in HTML5 Canvas2D. The engine can run client side or server side using Node. It allows t. awesome: 😎 Awesome lists about all kinds of interesting topics. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose litegraph.js over awesome?
Choose litegraph.js over awesome when License: litegraph.js is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0; Tags unique to litegraph.js: blueprints, canvas2d, editor, graph.
When should I choose awesome over litegraph.js?
Choose awesome over litegraph.js when License: awesome is CC0-1.0, litegraph.js is MIT; Tags unique to awesome: awesome, awesome-list, lists, resources; When you need well-organized access to diverse technical subjects from IoT to robotics.
When should I avoid litegraph.js?
Last GitHub push was 713 days ago (dormant maintenance, Aug 1, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on litegraph.js. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid awesome?
If seeking specific coding frameworks or libraries for software development rather than hardware-focused resources In scenarios requiring real-time interactive support or forums, as the content is static lists without active discussion
Is litegraph.js or awesome more popular on GitHub?
awesome has more GitHub stars (484,026 vs 8,078). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are litegraph.js and awesome open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (litegraph.js: MIT, awesome: CC0-1.0).
Where can I find alternatives to litegraph.js or awesome?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at litegraph.js alternatives and awesome alternatives (litegraph.js markdown twin, awesome markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, litegraph.js or awesome?
litegraph.js: Dormant. awesome: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for litegraph.js and awesome?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: litegraph.js trust report; awesome trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.