Home/Compare/jan vs wllama

Comparison

jan vs wllama

Verdict

Pick jan when license: jan is Other, wllama is MIT; pick wllama when license: wllama is MIT, jan is Other.

Markdown twin · jan alternatives · wllama alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

jan logo

jan

janhq/jan

43kpushed Jul 10, 2026
vs
wllama logo

wllama

ngxson/wllama

1.1kpushed Jun 17, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signaljanwllama
Maintenance
Very active (1d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Active (23d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
9 low (9 low)
As of today · osv@v1

Tagline

jan
open source alternative to ChatGPT that runs offline locally
wllama
WebAssembly binding for llama.cpp - Enabling on-browser LLM inference

Stars

jan
43k
wllama
1.1k

Forks

jan
2.9k
wllama
106

Open issues

jan
387
wllama
50

Language

jan
TypeScript
wllama
TypeScript

Adopt for

jan
Jan is a TypeScript-based, self-hosted chatbot application that acts as an offline alternative to services like ChatGPT.
wllama
-

Persona

jan
-
wllama
-

Runtime

jan
-
wllama
-

License

jan
Other
wllama
MIT

Last pushed

jan
Jul 10, 2026
wllama
Jun 17, 2026

Categories

jan
LLM Frameworks, Inference & Serving
wllama
LLM Frameworks, Inference & Serving

Trust and health

Maintenance

jan
Very active (96%)
wllama
Active (82%)

Days since push

jan
1d
wllama
23d

Open issues (now)

jan
387
wllama
50

Owner type

jan
Organization
wllama
User

Security scan

jan
No lockfile
wllama
9 low (9 low)

Full report

Choose jan if…

  • License: jan is Other, wllama is MIT.
  • Tags unique to jan: tauri, self-hosted, chatgpt, gpt.
  • - If you require an offline-capable AI assistant for environments without internet access.

When NOT to use jan

  • - If you require real-time updates to the AI model, since Jan uses static local models which may not get frequent updates.
  • - When a vast knowledge base or continuous learning capabilities are essential, as Jan's offline nature constrains its ability to stay current with new information.

Choose wllama if…

  • License: wllama is MIT, jan is Other.
  • Tags unique to wllama: webassembly, llama, typescript, wasm.
  • Leaner open-issue backlog (50).

When NOT to use wllama

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: jan 43k · wllama 1.1k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between jan and wllama?
jan: open source alternative to ChatGPT that runs offline locally. wllama: WebAssembly binding for llama.cpp - Enabling on-browser LLM inference. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose jan over wllama?
Choose jan over wllama when License: jan is Other, wllama is MIT; Tags unique to jan: tauri, self-hosted, chatgpt, gpt; - If you require an offline-capable AI assistant for environments without internet access.
When should I choose wllama over jan?
Choose wllama over jan when License: wllama is MIT, jan is Other; Tags unique to wllama: webassembly, llama, typescript, wasm; Leaner open-issue backlog (50).
When should I avoid jan?
- If you require real-time updates to the AI model, since Jan uses static local models which may not get frequent updates. - When a vast knowledge base or continuous learning capabilities are essential, as Jan's offline nature constrains its ability to stay current with new information.
When should I avoid wllama?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Is jan or wllama more popular on GitHub?
jan has more GitHub stars (43,499 vs 1,138). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are jan and wllama open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (jan: Other, wllama: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to jan or wllama?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at jan alternatives and wllama alternatives (jan markdown twin, wllama markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, jan or wllama?
jan: Very active. wllama: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for jan and wllama?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: jan trust report; wllama trust report.