Home/Compare/kereva-scanner vs ps-fuzz

Comparison

kereva-scanner vs ps-fuzz

Verdict

Pick kereva-scanner when license: kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0, ps-fuzz is MIT; pick ps-fuzz when license: ps-fuzz is MIT, kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · kereva-scanner alternatives · ps-fuzz alternatives

GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026

14views this month

kereva-scanner logo

kereva-scanner

kereva-dev/kereva-scanner

78pushed Apr 6, 2025
vs
ps-fuzz logo

ps-fuzz

prompt-security/ps-fuzz

707pushed Aug 19, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalkereva-scannerps-fuzz
Maintenance
Dormant (520d since push)
As of Sep 9, 2026 · github_public_v1
Active (16d since push)
As of Sep 5, 2026 · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 9, 2026 · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 5, 2026 · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

kereva-scanner
Code scanner to check for issues in prompts and LLM calls
ps-fuzz
Test and harden system prompts for GenAI apps to ensure safety and security.

Stars

kereva-scanner
78
ps-fuzz
707

Forks

kereva-scanner
8
ps-fuzz
104

Open issues

kereva-scanner
3
ps-fuzz
19

Language

kereva-scanner
Python
ps-fuzz
Python

Adopt for

kereva-scanner
kereva-scanner is a specialized code scanner that assesses AI prompts and interactions with language models for potential security vulnerabilities and performance inefficiencies.
ps-fuzz
-

Persona

kereva-scanner
-
ps-fuzz
-

Runtime

kereva-scanner
-
ps-fuzz
-

License

kereva-scanner
Apache-2.0
ps-fuzz
MIT

Last pushed

kereva-scanner
Apr 6, 2025
ps-fuzz
Aug 19, 2026

Categories

kereva-scanner
Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability
ps-fuzz
Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability

Trust and health

Maintenance

kereva-scanner
Dormant (18%)
ps-fuzz
Active (82%)

Days since push

kereva-scanner
520d
ps-fuzz
16d

Open issues (now)

kereva-scanner
3
ps-fuzz
19

Stars delta

kereva-scanner
0 (30d)
ps-fuzz
+5 (30d)

Open issues delta

kereva-scanner
0 (30d)
ps-fuzz
-1 (30d)

OSV dependency advisories

kereva-scanner
Published findings
ps-fuzz
No lockfile (source not queried)

Full report

kereva-scanner
Trust report

Shared compatibility

  • Python · kereva-scanner: Python runtime · ps-fuzz: Python runtime

Choose kereva-scanner if…

  • License: kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0, ps-fuzz is MIT.
  • Pricing: The tool is free under the Apache-2.0 license but may have features in a paid version not detailed in the repository..
  • Requirements: .
  • Tags unique to kereva-scanner: ai-code-review, hallucination, llm-evaluation, llm-security.
  • When you are developing applications involving AI-generated content or integrations with large language models, to ensure your prompts are secure against attacks such as prompt injection.

When NOT to use kereva-scanner

  • When your project does not involve interactions with language models or AI-generated content, since the scanner's utility is primarily in evaluating AI-related issues.
  • If you are looking for a comprehensive general code linter that checks for coding standard violations or general best practices unrelated to security and performance of LLMs.

Choose ps-fuzz if…

  • License: ps-fuzz is MIT, kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to ps-fuzz: ai-fuzzer, fuzzer, generative-ai, llm-fuzzer.
  • When you need to methodically test system prompts in generative AI applications for potential security flaws.

When NOT to use ps-fuzz

  • If your project does not involve generative AI applications or does not require prompt testing for security reasons.
  • For tasks unrelated to the hardening and evaluation of system prompts, as ps-fuzz is specifically designed for this purpose.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: kereva-scanner 78 · ps-fuzz 707 (synced Sep 20, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between kereva-scanner and ps-fuzz?
kereva-scanner: Code scanner to check for issues in prompts and LLM calls. ps-fuzz: Test and harden system prompts for GenAI apps to ensure safety and security.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose kereva-scanner over ps-fuzz?
Choose kereva-scanner over ps-fuzz when License: kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0, ps-fuzz is MIT; Pricing: The tool is free under the Apache-2.0 license but may have features in a paid version not detailed in the repository.; Requirements: ; Tags unique to kereva-scanner: ai-code-review, hallucination, llm-evaluation, llm-security; When you are developing applications involving AI-generated content or integrations with large language models, to ensure your prompts are secure against attacks such as prompt injection.
When should I choose ps-fuzz over kereva-scanner?
Choose ps-fuzz over kereva-scanner when License: ps-fuzz is MIT, kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to ps-fuzz: ai-fuzzer, fuzzer, generative-ai, llm-fuzzer; When you need to methodically test system prompts in generative AI applications for potential security flaws.
When should I avoid kereva-scanner?
When your project does not involve interactions with language models or AI-generated content, since the scanner's utility is primarily in evaluating AI-related issues. If you are looking for a comprehensive general code linter that checks for coding standard violations or general best practices unrelated to security and performance of LLMs.
When should I avoid ps-fuzz?
If your project does not involve generative AI applications or does not require prompt testing for security reasons. For tasks unrelated to the hardening and evaluation of system prompts, as ps-fuzz is specifically designed for this purpose.
Is kereva-scanner or ps-fuzz more popular on GitHub?
ps-fuzz has more GitHub stars (707 vs 78). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are kereva-scanner and ps-fuzz open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (kereva-scanner: Apache-2.0, ps-fuzz: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to kereva-scanner or ps-fuzz?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at kereva-scanner alternatives and ps-fuzz alternatives (kereva-scanner markdown twin, ps-fuzz markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, kereva-scanner or ps-fuzz?
kereva-scanner: Dormant. ps-fuzz: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for kereva-scanner and ps-fuzz?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: kereva-scanner trust report; ps-fuzz trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.