Comparison
kereva-scanner vs ps-fuzz
Verdict
Pick kereva-scanner when license: kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0, ps-fuzz is MIT; pick ps-fuzz when license: ps-fuzz is MIT, kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0.
Markdown twin · kereva-scanner alternatives · ps-fuzz alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026
14views this month
Trust & integrity
| Signal | kereva-scanner | ps-fuzz |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (520d since push) As of Sep 9, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Active (16d since push) As of Sep 5, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 9, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 5, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- kereva-scanner
- Code scanner to check for issues in prompts and LLM calls
- ps-fuzz
- Test and harden system prompts for GenAI apps to ensure safety and security.
Stars
- kereva-scanner
- 78
- ps-fuzz
- 707
Forks
- kereva-scanner
- 8
- ps-fuzz
- 104
Open issues
- kereva-scanner
- 3
- ps-fuzz
- 19
Language
- kereva-scanner
- Python
- ps-fuzz
- Python
Adopt for
- kereva-scanner
- kereva-scanner is a specialized code scanner that assesses AI prompts and interactions with language models for potential security vulnerabilities and performance inefficiencies.
- ps-fuzz
- -
Persona
- kereva-scanner
- -
- ps-fuzz
- -
Runtime
- kereva-scanner
- -
- ps-fuzz
- -
License
- kereva-scanner
- Apache-2.0
- ps-fuzz
- MIT
Last pushed
- kereva-scanner
- Apr 6, 2025
- ps-fuzz
- Aug 19, 2026
Categories
- kereva-scanner
- Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability
- ps-fuzz
- Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- kereva-scanner
- Dormant (18%)
- ps-fuzz
- Active (82%)
Days since push
- kereva-scanner
- 520d
- ps-fuzz
- 16d
Open issues (now)
- kereva-scanner
- 3
- ps-fuzz
- 19
Stars delta
- kereva-scanner
- 0 (30d)
- ps-fuzz
- +5 (30d)
Open issues delta
- kereva-scanner
- 0 (30d)
- ps-fuzz
- -1 (30d)
OSV dependency advisories
- kereva-scanner
- Published findings
- ps-fuzz
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- kereva-scanner
- Trust report
- ps-fuzz
- Trust report
Shared compatibility
- Python · kereva-scanner: Python runtime · ps-fuzz: Python runtime
Choose kereva-scanner if…
- License: kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0, ps-fuzz is MIT.
- Pricing: The tool is free under the Apache-2.0 license but may have features in a paid version not detailed in the repository..
- Requirements: .
- Tags unique to kereva-scanner: ai-code-review, hallucination, llm-evaluation, llm-security.
- When you are developing applications involving AI-generated content or integrations with large language models, to ensure your prompts are secure against attacks such as prompt injection.
When NOT to use kereva-scanner
- When your project does not involve interactions with language models or AI-generated content, since the scanner's utility is primarily in evaluating AI-related issues.
- If you are looking for a comprehensive general code linter that checks for coding standard violations or general best practices unrelated to security and performance of LLMs.
Choose ps-fuzz if…
- License: ps-fuzz is MIT, kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to ps-fuzz: ai-fuzzer, fuzzer, generative-ai, llm-fuzzer.
- When you need to methodically test system prompts in generative AI applications for potential security flaws.
When NOT to use ps-fuzz
- If your project does not involve generative AI applications or does not require prompt testing for security reasons.
- For tasks unrelated to the hardening and evaluation of system prompts, as ps-fuzz is specifically designed for this purpose.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (kereva-dev/kereva-scanner) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (kereva-dev/kereva-scanner) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (kereva-dev/kereva-scanner) · observed Apr 6, 2025
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- GitHub stars (prompt-security/ps-fuzz) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (prompt-security/ps-fuzz) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (prompt-security/ps-fuzz) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: kereva-scanner 78 · ps-fuzz 707 (synced Sep 20, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between kereva-scanner and ps-fuzz?
- kereva-scanner: Code scanner to check for issues in prompts and LLM calls. ps-fuzz: Test and harden system prompts for GenAI apps to ensure safety and security.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose kereva-scanner over ps-fuzz?
- Choose kereva-scanner over ps-fuzz when License: kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0, ps-fuzz is MIT; Pricing: The tool is free under the Apache-2.0 license but may have features in a paid version not detailed in the repository.; Requirements: ; Tags unique to kereva-scanner: ai-code-review, hallucination, llm-evaluation, llm-security; When you are developing applications involving AI-generated content or integrations with large language models, to ensure your prompts are secure against attacks such as prompt injection.
- When should I choose ps-fuzz over kereva-scanner?
- Choose ps-fuzz over kereva-scanner when License: ps-fuzz is MIT, kereva-scanner is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to ps-fuzz: ai-fuzzer, fuzzer, generative-ai, llm-fuzzer; When you need to methodically test system prompts in generative AI applications for potential security flaws.
- When should I avoid kereva-scanner?
- When your project does not involve interactions with language models or AI-generated content, since the scanner's utility is primarily in evaluating AI-related issues. If you are looking for a comprehensive general code linter that checks for coding standard violations or general best practices unrelated to security and performance of LLMs.
- When should I avoid ps-fuzz?
- If your project does not involve generative AI applications or does not require prompt testing for security reasons. For tasks unrelated to the hardening and evaluation of system prompts, as ps-fuzz is specifically designed for this purpose.
- Is kereva-scanner or ps-fuzz more popular on GitHub?
- ps-fuzz has more GitHub stars (707 vs 78). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are kereva-scanner and ps-fuzz open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (kereva-scanner: Apache-2.0, ps-fuzz: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to kereva-scanner or ps-fuzz?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at kereva-scanner alternatives and ps-fuzz alternatives (kereva-scanner markdown twin, ps-fuzz markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, kereva-scanner or ps-fuzz?
- kereva-scanner: Dormant. ps-fuzz: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for kereva-scanner and ps-fuzz?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: kereva-scanner trust report; ps-fuzz trust report.