Home/Compare/tree-of-thoughts vs awesome

Comparison

tree-of-thoughts vs awesome

Verdict

Pick tree-of-thoughts when license: tree-of-thoughts is Apache-2.0, awesome is CC0-1.0; pick awesome when license: awesome is CC0-1.0, tree-of-thoughts is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · tree-of-thoughts alternatives · awesome alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

tree-of-thoughts logo

tree-of-thoughts

kyegomez/tree-of-thoughts

4.6kpushed Jul 29, 2025
vs
awesome logo

awesome

sindresorhus/awesome

484kpushed Jun 30, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signaltree-of-thoughtsawesome
Maintenance
Slowing (347d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Active (11d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No lockfile
As of today · none

Tagline

tree-of-thoughts
Plug in and Play Implementation of Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models that Elevates Model Reasoning by atleast 70%
awesome
😎 Curated list of awesome topics including hardware resources

Stars

tree-of-thoughts
4.6k
awesome
484k

Forks

tree-of-thoughts
374
awesome
36k

Open issues

tree-of-thoughts
21
awesome
92

Language

tree-of-thoughts
Python
awesome
-

Adopt for

tree-of-thoughts
-
awesome
-

Persona

tree-of-thoughts
-
awesome
-

Runtime

tree-of-thoughts
-
awesome
-

License

tree-of-thoughts
Apache-2.0
awesome
CC0-1.0

Last pushed

tree-of-thoughts
Jul 29, 2025
awesome
Jun 30, 2026

Categories

tree-of-thoughts
LLM Frameworks
awesome
LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Maintenance

tree-of-thoughts
Slowing (36%)
awesome
Active (82%)

Days since push

tree-of-thoughts
347d
awesome
11d

Open issues (now)

tree-of-thoughts
21
awesome
92

Full report

tree-of-thoughts
Trust report

Choose tree-of-thoughts if…

  • License: tree-of-thoughts is Apache-2.0, awesome is CC0-1.0.
  • Tags unique to tree-of-thoughts: gpt4, deep-learning, artificial-intelligence, prompt-learning.
  • Leaner open-issue backlog (21).

When NOT to use tree-of-thoughts

  • Last GitHub push was 348 days ago (slowing maintenance, Jul 29, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on tree-of-thoughts.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Choose awesome if…

  • License: awesome is CC0-1.0, tree-of-thoughts is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to awesome: resources, awesome-list.
  • More GitHub stars (484k vs 4.6k) - visibility, not fit.

When NOT to use awesome

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: tree-of-thoughts 4.6k · awesome 484k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between tree-of-thoughts and awesome?
tree-of-thoughts: Plug in and Play Implementation of Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models that Elevates Model Reasoning by atleast 70%. awesome: 😎 Curated list of awesome topics including hardware resources. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose tree-of-thoughts over awesome?
Choose tree-of-thoughts over awesome when License: tree-of-thoughts is Apache-2.0, awesome is CC0-1.0; Tags unique to tree-of-thoughts: gpt4, deep-learning, artificial-intelligence, prompt-learning; Leaner open-issue backlog (21).
When should I choose awesome over tree-of-thoughts?
Choose awesome over tree-of-thoughts when License: awesome is CC0-1.0, tree-of-thoughts is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to awesome: resources, awesome-list; More GitHub stars (484k vs 4.6k) - visibility, not fit.
When should I avoid tree-of-thoughts?
Last GitHub push was 348 days ago (slowing maintenance, Jul 29, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on tree-of-thoughts. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
When should I avoid awesome?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
Is tree-of-thoughts or awesome more popular on GitHub?
awesome has more GitHub stars (484,026 vs 4,588). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are tree-of-thoughts and awesome open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (tree-of-thoughts: Apache-2.0, awesome: CC0-1.0).
Where can I find alternatives to tree-of-thoughts or awesome?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at tree-of-thoughts alternatives and awesome alternatives (tree-of-thoughts markdown twin, awesome markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, tree-of-thoughts or awesome?
tree-of-thoughts: Slowing. awesome: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for tree-of-thoughts and awesome?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: tree-of-thoughts trust report; awesome trust report.