Comparison
auto-evaluator vs chatgpt-plugin-eval
Verdict
Pick auto-evaluator when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; chatgpt-plugin-eval is HTML; pick chatgpt-plugin-eval when chatgpt-plugin-eval is primarily HTML; auto-evaluator is TypeScript.
Markdown twin · auto-evaluator alternatives · chatgpt-plugin-eval alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | auto-evaluator | chatgpt-plugin-eval |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Archived (408d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Dormant (736d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- auto-evaluator
- auto-evaluator
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Framework for Evaluating Security in LLM Plugin Ecosystems
Stars
- auto-evaluator
- 783
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- 29
Forks
- auto-evaluator
- 102
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- 7
Open issues
- auto-evaluator
- 21
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- 1
Language
- auto-evaluator
- TypeScript
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- HTML
Adopt for
- auto-evaluator
- -
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- chatgpt-plugin-eval is an evaluation framework designed specifically to assess security, privacy, and safety concerns related to third-party plugins interfacing with large language models like ChatGPT.
Persona
- auto-evaluator
- -
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- -
Runtime
- auto-evaluator
- -
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- -
License
- auto-evaluator
- Other
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- The license information for chatgpt-plugin-eval is unknown.
Last pushed
- auto-evaluator
- Jun 26, 2025
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Jul 29, 2024
Categories
- auto-evaluator
- Evaluation & Observability
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- auto-evaluator
- Archived (8%)
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Dormant (18%)
Days since push
- auto-evaluator
- 408d
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- 736d
Archived on GitHub
- auto-evaluator
- Yes
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- No
Open issues (now)
- auto-evaluator
- 21
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- 1
Full report
- auto-evaluator
- Trust report
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Trust report
Choose auto-evaluator if…
- auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; chatgpt-plugin-eval is HTML.
- Tags unique to auto-evaluator: auto-evaluation, railway, typescript, vercel.
- Use auto-evaluator when you are working with TypeScript and need an integrated solution for evaluating AI models
When NOT to use auto-evaluator
- Avoid using auto-evaluator if you require a multi-language support environment, as it focuses solely on TypeScript
- Do not use this tool if your project's hosting requirements do not align with using Vercel or Railway
Choose chatgpt-plugin-eval if…
- chatgpt-plugin-eval is primarily HTML; auto-evaluator is TypeScript.
- Tags unique to chatgpt-plugin-eval: chatgpt, llm-plugins, privacy, security.
- - When evaluating the security risks of integrating third-party services into your LLM platform through plugins
When NOT to use chatgpt-plugin-eval
- - In cases where only generic, high-level security guidance is required without an in-depth framework analysis
- - When the primary focus is on improving performance metrics rather than addressing specific security and privacy concerns of LLM plugins
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (langchain-ai/auto-evaluator) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- GitHub forks (langchain-ai/auto-evaluator) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Last push (langchain-ai/auto-evaluator) · observed Jun 26, 2025
- License file (Other) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (llm-platform-security/chatgpt-plugin-eval) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (llm-platform-security/chatgpt-plugin-eval) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Last push (llm-platform-security/chatgpt-plugin-eval) · observed Jul 29, 2024
- License file (unknown) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: auto-evaluator 783 · chatgpt-plugin-eval 29 (synced Aug 8, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between auto-evaluator and chatgpt-plugin-eval?
- auto-evaluator: auto-evaluator. chatgpt-plugin-eval: Framework for Evaluating Security in LLM Plugin Ecosystems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose auto-evaluator over chatgpt-plugin-eval?
- Choose auto-evaluator over chatgpt-plugin-eval when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; chatgpt-plugin-eval is HTML; Tags unique to auto-evaluator: auto-evaluation, railway, typescript, vercel; Use auto-evaluator when you are working with TypeScript and need an integrated solution for evaluating AI models.
- When should I choose chatgpt-plugin-eval over auto-evaluator?
- Choose chatgpt-plugin-eval over auto-evaluator when chatgpt-plugin-eval is primarily HTML; auto-evaluator is TypeScript; Tags unique to chatgpt-plugin-eval: chatgpt, llm-plugins, privacy, security; - When evaluating the security risks of integrating third-party services into your LLM platform through plugins.
- When should I avoid auto-evaluator?
- Avoid using auto-evaluator if you require a multi-language support environment, as it focuses solely on TypeScript Do not use this tool if your project's hosting requirements do not align with using Vercel or Railway
- When should I avoid chatgpt-plugin-eval?
- - In cases where only generic, high-level security guidance is required without an in-depth framework analysis - When the primary focus is on improving performance metrics rather than addressing specific security and privacy concerns of LLM plugins
- Is auto-evaluator or chatgpt-plugin-eval more popular on GitHub?
- auto-evaluator has more GitHub stars (783 vs 29). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are auto-evaluator and chatgpt-plugin-eval open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.
- Where can I find alternatives to auto-evaluator or chatgpt-plugin-eval?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at auto-evaluator alternatives and chatgpt-plugin-eval alternatives (auto-evaluator markdown twin, chatgpt-plugin-eval markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, auto-evaluator or chatgpt-plugin-eval?
- auto-evaluator: Archived. chatgpt-plugin-eval: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for auto-evaluator and chatgpt-plugin-eval?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: auto-evaluator trust report; chatgpt-plugin-eval trust report.