Comparison
auto-evaluator vs simple-evals
Verdict
Pick auto-evaluator when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; simple-evals is Python; pick simple-evals when simple-evals is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript.
Markdown twin · auto-evaluator alternatives · simple-evals alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | auto-evaluator | simple-evals |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Archived (408d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Slowing (106d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- auto-evaluator
- auto-evaluator
- simple-evals
- A lightweight library for evaluating language models.
Stars
- auto-evaluator
- 783
- simple-evals
- 4.6k
Forks
- auto-evaluator
- 102
- simple-evals
- 501
Open issues
- auto-evaluator
- 21
- simple-evals
- 56
Language
- auto-evaluator
- TypeScript
- simple-evals
- Python
Adopt for
- auto-evaluator
- -
- simple-evals
- simple-evals provides lightweight tools for evaluating language models using reference implementations from HealthBench, BrowseComp, SimpleQA. Last updates July 2025.
Persona
- auto-evaluator
- -
- simple-evals
- -
Runtime
- auto-evaluator
- -
- simple-evals
- -
License
- auto-evaluator
- Other
- simple-evals
- MIT licensed Python library for transparent language model evaluations with specific benchmark support until July 2025.
Last pushed
- auto-evaluator
- Jun 26, 2025
- simple-evals
- Apr 22, 2026
Categories
- auto-evaluator
- Evaluation & Observability
- simple-evals
- Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- auto-evaluator
- Archived (8%)
- simple-evals
- Slowing (36%)
Days since push
- auto-evaluator
- 408d
- simple-evals
- 106d
Archived on GitHub
- auto-evaluator
- Yes
- simple-evals
- No
Open issues (now)
- auto-evaluator
- 21
- simple-evals
- 56
Full report
- auto-evaluator
- Trust report
- simple-evals
- Trust report
Choose auto-evaluator if…
- auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; simple-evals is Python.
- License: auto-evaluator is Other, simple-evals is MIT.
- Tags unique to auto-evaluator: auto-evaluation, railway, typescript, vercel.
- Use auto-evaluator when you are working with TypeScript and need an integrated solution for evaluating AI models
When NOT to use auto-evaluator
- Avoid using auto-evaluator if you require a multi-language support environment, as it focuses solely on TypeScript
- Do not use this tool if your project's hosting requirements do not align with using Vercel or Railway
Choose simple-evals if…
- simple-evals is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript.
- License: simple-evals is MIT, auto-evaluator is Other.
- Tags unique to simple-evals: benchmark, depreciation notice, evaluation, language-models.
- When you need a stable baseline to evaluate model performance with specific benchmarks like MMLU, HumanEval, and DROP that won't change after July 2025
When NOT to use simple-evals
- For evaluating models released or significantly updated after July 2025, as this tool does not include future benchmarks
- When you need a tool that will adapt and expand its benchmark set with emerging model releases and evaluation tasks beyond 2025
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (langchain-ai/auto-evaluator) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- GitHub forks (langchain-ai/auto-evaluator) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Last push (langchain-ai/auto-evaluator) · observed Jun 26, 2025
- License file (Other) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (openai/simple-evals) · observed Aug 7, 2026
- GitHub forks (openai/simple-evals) · observed Aug 7, 2026
- Last push (openai/simple-evals) · observed Apr 22, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Aug 7, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 14, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: auto-evaluator 783 · simple-evals 4.6k (synced Aug 8, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between auto-evaluator and simple-evals?
- auto-evaluator: auto-evaluator. simple-evals: A lightweight library for evaluating language models.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose auto-evaluator over simple-evals?
- Choose auto-evaluator over simple-evals when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; simple-evals is Python; License: auto-evaluator is Other, simple-evals is MIT; Tags unique to auto-evaluator: auto-evaluation, railway, typescript, vercel; Use auto-evaluator when you are working with TypeScript and need an integrated solution for evaluating AI models.
- When should I choose simple-evals over auto-evaluator?
- Choose simple-evals over auto-evaluator when simple-evals is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript; License: simple-evals is MIT, auto-evaluator is Other; Tags unique to simple-evals: benchmark, depreciation notice, evaluation, language-models; When you need a stable baseline to evaluate model performance with specific benchmarks like MMLU, HumanEval, and DROP that won't change after July 2025.
- When should I avoid auto-evaluator?
- Avoid using auto-evaluator if you require a multi-language support environment, as it focuses solely on TypeScript Do not use this tool if your project's hosting requirements do not align with using Vercel or Railway
- When should I avoid simple-evals?
- For evaluating models released or significantly updated after July 2025, as this tool does not include future benchmarks When you need a tool that will adapt and expand its benchmark set with emerging model releases and evaluation tasks beyond 2025
- Is auto-evaluator or simple-evals more popular on GitHub?
- simple-evals has more GitHub stars (4,595 vs 783). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are auto-evaluator and simple-evals open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (auto-evaluator: Other, simple-evals: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to auto-evaluator or simple-evals?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at auto-evaluator alternatives and simple-evals alternatives (auto-evaluator markdown twin, simple-evals markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, auto-evaluator or simple-evals?
- auto-evaluator: Archived. simple-evals: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for auto-evaluator and simple-evals?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: auto-evaluator trust report; simple-evals trust report.