Home/Compare/open-swe vs dify

Comparison

open-swe vs dify

Verdict

Pick open-swe if open-swe is an open-source asynchronous coding agent that allows customization of components like models, sandboxes, tools, triggers, prompts, and middleware; pick dify if dify is a comprehensive low-code/no-code AI agentic framework designed for workflow and process automation, offering deployment via Docker Compose and multiple cloud platforms.

Markdown twin · open-swe alternatives · dify alternatives

GraphCanon updated 1d

open-swe logo

open-swe

langchain-ai/open-swe

11kpushed Aug 19, 2026
vs
dify logo

dify

langgenius/dify

152kpushed Aug 7, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalopen-swedify
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of 1d · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of 1w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 1d · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 1w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

open-swe
An Open-Source Asynchronous Coding Agent
dify
Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development

Stars

open-swe
11k
dify
152k

Forks

open-swe
1.2k
dify
24k

Open issues

open-swe
28
dify
931

Language

open-swe
Python
dify
TypeScript

Adopt for

open-swe
open-swe is an open-source asynchronous coding agent that allows customization of components like models, sandboxes, tools, triggers, prompts, and middleware.
dify
Dify is a comprehensive low-code/no-code AI agentic framework designed for workflow and process automation, offering deployment via Docker Compose and multiple cloud platforms.

Persona

open-swe
-
dify
-

Runtime

open-swe
-
dify
-

License

open-swe
MIT
dify
Other

Last pushed

open-swe
Aug 19, 2026
dify
Aug 7, 2026

Categories

open-swe
AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability
dify
AI Agents

Trust and health

Open issues (now)

open-swe
28
dify
931

Stars delta

open-swe
+221 (30d)
dify
+3.6k (30d)

Open issues delta

open-swe
+4 (30d)
dify
+118 (30d)

Full report

open-swe
Trust report

Typed relationship

open-swe alternative difyBoth provide platforms for agentic development, but Dify seems to offer more production-ready solutions compared to the open-swe which emphasizes on building custom internal coding agents.

Choose open-swe if…

  • open-swe is primarily Python; dify is TypeScript.
  • License: open-swe is MIT, dify is Other.
  • Both provide platforms for agentic development, but Dify seems to offer more production-ready solutions compared to the open-swe which emphasizes on building custom internal coding agents.
  • Tags unique to open-swe: ai, anthropic, claudecode, openai.
  • Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
  • open-swe ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • If you are integrating with Linear/Slack/GitHub workflows specifically as it seems to support these platforms natively.

When NOT to use open-swe

  • Not recommended if you require real-time interaction with coding agents instead of asynchronous communication.
  • Avoid choosing this tool if your project does not align well with customization options provided or if integration complexity outweighs benefits.

Choose dify if…

  • dify is primarily TypeScript; open-swe is Python.
  • License: dify is Other, open-swe is MIT.
  • Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker.
  • Both provide platforms for agentic development, but Dify seems to offer more production-ready solutions compared to the open-swe which emphasizes on building custom internal coding agents.
  • Tags unique to dify: agentic-ai, agentic-framework, automation, gemini.
  • When you need a production-grade platform with support for various deployment methods such as Docker Compose, Kubernetes Helm Charts, Terraform, AWS CDK, and Alibaba Cloud services.

When NOT to use dify

  • If your project strictly requires a specific proprietary licensing scheme not aligned with Dify’s customized open-source license that is based on Apache 2.0.
  • In cases where the desired workflow development tool should be written in a language other than TypeScript or Python, as Dify centers primarily around these languages.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: open-swe 11k · dify 152k (synced Aug 19, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between open-swe and dify?
open-swe: An Open-Source Asynchronous Coding Agent. dify: Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose open-swe over dify?
Choose open-swe over dify when open-swe is primarily Python; dify is TypeScript; License: open-swe is MIT, dify is Other; Both provide platforms for agentic development, but Dify seems to offer more production-ready solutions compared to the open-swe which emphasizes on building custom internal coding agents; Tags unique to open-swe: ai, anthropic, claudecode, openai; Also covers Evaluation & Observability; open-swe ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; If you are integrating with Linear/Slack/GitHub workflows specifically as it seems to support these platforms natively.
When should I choose dify over open-swe?
Choose dify over open-swe when dify is primarily TypeScript; open-swe is Python; License: dify is Other, open-swe is MIT; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Both provide platforms for agentic development, but Dify seems to offer more production-ready solutions compared to the open-swe which emphasizes on building custom internal coding agents; Tags unique to dify: agentic-ai, agentic-framework, automation, gemini; When you need a production-grade platform with support for various deployment methods such as Docker Compose, Kubernetes Helm Charts, Terraform, AWS CDK, and Alibaba Cloud services.
When should I avoid open-swe?
Not recommended if you require real-time interaction with coding agents instead of asynchronous communication. Avoid choosing this tool if your project does not align well with customization options provided or if integration complexity outweighs benefits.
When should I avoid dify?
If your project strictly requires a specific proprietary licensing scheme not aligned with Dify’s customized open-source license that is based on Apache 2.0. In cases where the desired workflow development tool should be written in a language other than TypeScript or Python, as Dify centers primarily around these languages.
Is open-swe or dify more popular on GitHub?
dify has more GitHub stars (151,725 vs 10,576). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are open-swe and dify open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (open-swe: MIT, dify: Other).
Where can I find alternatives to open-swe or dify?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at open-swe alternatives and dify alternatives (open-swe markdown twin, dify markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, open-swe or dify?
open-swe: Very active. dify: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for open-swe and dify?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: open-swe trust report; dify trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.