Comparison
open-swe vs voratiq
Verdict
Pick open-swe if open-swe is an open-source asynchronous coding agent that allows customization of components like models, sandboxes, tools, triggers, prompts, and middleware; pick voratiq if voratiq serves as an AI-driven code generation tool that focuses on orchestrating multi-agent environments. It supports TypeScript and operates under the MIT License.
Markdown twin · open-swe alternatives · voratiq alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 9, 2026
17views this month
Trust & integrity
| Signal | open-swe | voratiq |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of Aug 19, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Slowing (126d since push) As of Sep 9, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Aug 19, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 9, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- open-swe
- An Open-Source Asynchronous Coding Agent
- voratiq
- Which coding agent wins on real work?
Stars
- open-swe
- 11k
- voratiq
- 74
Forks
- open-swe
- 1.2k
- voratiq
- 2
Open issues
- open-swe
- 28
- voratiq
- 0
Language
- open-swe
- Python
- voratiq
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- open-swe
- open-swe is an open-source asynchronous coding agent that allows customization of components like models, sandboxes, tools, triggers, prompts, and middleware.
- voratiq
- Voratiq serves as an AI-driven code generation tool that focuses on orchestrating multi-agent environments. It supports TypeScript and operates under the MIT License.
Persona
- open-swe
- -
- voratiq
- -
Runtime
- open-swe
- -
- voratiq
- -
License
- open-swe
- MIT
- voratiq
- MIT
Last pushed
- open-swe
- Aug 19, 2026
- voratiq
- May 5, 2026
Categories
- open-swe
- AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability
- voratiq
- AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- open-swe
- Very active (96%)
- voratiq
- Slowing (36%)
Days since push
- open-swe
- 0d
- voratiq
- 126d
Open issues (now)
- open-swe
- 28
- voratiq
- 0
Stars delta
- open-swe
- +221 (30d)
- voratiq
- +1 (30d)
Open issues delta
- open-swe
- +4 (30d)
- voratiq
- 0 (30d)
Full report
- open-swe
- Trust report
- voratiq
- Trust report
Choose open-swe if…
- open-swe is primarily Python; voratiq is TypeScript.
- Tags unique to open-swe: agent, ai, anthropic, claudecode.
- open-swe ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- If you are integrating with Linear/Slack/GitHub workflows specifically as it seems to support these platforms natively.
When NOT to use open-swe
- Not recommended if you require real-time interaction with coding agents instead of asynchronous communication.
- Avoid choosing this tool if your project does not align well with customization options provided or if integration complexity outweighs benefits.
Choose voratiq if…
- voratiq is primarily TypeScript; open-swe is Python.
- Tags unique to voratiq: agent-orchestration, code-generation, evals, multi-agent.
- - When your development requires TypeScript, and you are working on complex software tasks where multiple coding agents can contribute to a solution
When NOT to use voratiq
- - If the project does not require TypeScript but uses another language as Voratiq is optimized for TypeScript environments
- - For unsupported platforms such as Windows, as Voratiq only supports Mac and Linux (Debian/Ubuntu) with certain dependencies required on each
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (langchain-ai/open-swe) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- GitHub forks (langchain-ai/open-swe) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- Last push (langchain-ai/open-swe) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (voratiq/voratiq) · observed Sep 9, 2026
- GitHub forks (voratiq/voratiq) · observed Sep 9, 2026
- Last push (voratiq/voratiq) · observed May 5, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Sep 9, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: open-swe 11k · voratiq 74 (synced Aug 19, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between open-swe and voratiq?
- open-swe: An Open-Source Asynchronous Coding Agent. voratiq: Which coding agent wins on real work?. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose open-swe over voratiq?
- Choose open-swe over voratiq when open-swe is primarily Python; voratiq is TypeScript; Tags unique to open-swe: agent, ai, anthropic, claudecode; open-swe ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; If you are integrating with Linear/Slack/GitHub workflows specifically as it seems to support these platforms natively.
- When should I choose voratiq over open-swe?
- Choose voratiq over open-swe when voratiq is primarily TypeScript; open-swe is Python; Tags unique to voratiq: agent-orchestration, code-generation, evals, multi-agent; - When your development requires TypeScript, and you are working on complex software tasks where multiple coding agents can contribute to a solution.
- When should I avoid open-swe?
- Not recommended if you require real-time interaction with coding agents instead of asynchronous communication. Avoid choosing this tool if your project does not align well with customization options provided or if integration complexity outweighs benefits.
- When should I avoid voratiq?
- - If the project does not require TypeScript but uses another language as Voratiq is optimized for TypeScript environments - For unsupported platforms such as Windows, as Voratiq only supports Mac and Linux (Debian/Ubuntu) with certain dependencies required on each
- Is open-swe or voratiq more popular on GitHub?
- open-swe has more GitHub stars (10,576 vs 74). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are open-swe and voratiq open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (open-swe: MIT, voratiq: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to open-swe or voratiq?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at open-swe alternatives and voratiq alternatives (open-swe markdown twin, voratiq markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, open-swe or voratiq?
- open-swe: Very active. voratiq: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for open-swe and voratiq?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: open-swe trust report; voratiq trust report.