Home/Compare/lint-staged vs awesome

Comparison

lint-staged vs awesome

Verdict

Pick lint-staged when license: lint-staged is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0; pick awesome when license: awesome is CC0-1.0, lint-staged is MIT.

Markdown twin · lint-staged alternatives · awesome alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

lint-staged logo

lint-staged

lint-staged/lint-staged

15kpushed Jul 15, 2026
vs
awesome logo

awesome

sindresorhus/awesome

484kpushed Jun 30, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signallint-stagedawesome
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Active (11d since push)
As of 3d · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 3d · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-15
As of today · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 3d · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

lint-staged
🚫💩, Run tasks like formatters and linters against staged git files
awesome
😎 Awesome lists about all kinds of interesting topics

Stars

lint-staged
15k
awesome
484k

Forks

lint-staged
464
awesome
36k

Open issues

lint-staged
10
awesome
92

Language

lint-staged
JavaScript
awesome
-

Adopt for

lint-staged
-
awesome
A curated collection of resources on a variety of technological topics, emphasizing hardware and robotics.

Persona

lint-staged
-
awesome
-

Runtime

lint-staged
-
awesome
-

License

lint-staged
MIT
awesome
CC0-1.0

Last pushed

lint-staged
Jul 15, 2026
awesome
Jun 30, 2026

Categories

lint-staged
Developer Tools
awesome
Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

lint-staged
Very active (96%)
awesome
Active (82%)

Days since push

lint-staged
0d
awesome
11d

Open issues (now)

lint-staged
10
awesome
92

Owner type

lint-staged
Organization
awesome
User

OSV dependency advisories

lint-staged
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-15
awesome
No lockfile (source not queried)

Full report

lint-staged
Trust report

Choose lint-staged if…

  • License: lint-staged is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0.
  • Tags unique to lint-staged: developer-experience, eslint, git, javascript.
  • More recently updated (last pushed Jul 15, 2026).

When NOT to use lint-staged

  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Choose awesome if…

  • License: awesome is CC0-1.0, lint-staged is MIT.
  • Tags unique to awesome: awesome, awesome-list, lists, resources.
  • When you need well-organized access to diverse technical subjects from IoT to robotics

When NOT to use awesome

  • If seeking specific coding frameworks or libraries for software development rather than hardware-focused resources
  • In scenarios requiring real-time interactive support or forums, as the content is static lists without active discussion

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: lint-staged 15k · awesome 484k (synced Jul 15, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between lint-staged and awesome?
lint-staged: 🚫💩, Run tasks like formatters and linters against staged git files. awesome: 😎 Awesome lists about all kinds of interesting topics. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose lint-staged over awesome?
Choose lint-staged over awesome when License: lint-staged is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0; Tags unique to lint-staged: developer-experience, eslint, git, javascript; More recently updated (last pushed Jul 15, 2026).
When should I choose awesome over lint-staged?
Choose awesome over lint-staged when License: awesome is CC0-1.0, lint-staged is MIT; Tags unique to awesome: awesome, awesome-list, lists, resources; When you need well-organized access to diverse technical subjects from IoT to robotics.
When should I avoid lint-staged?
Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid awesome?
If seeking specific coding frameworks or libraries for software development rather than hardware-focused resources In scenarios requiring real-time interactive support or forums, as the content is static lists without active discussion
Is lint-staged or awesome more popular on GitHub?
awesome has more GitHub stars (484,026 vs 14,684). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are lint-staged and awesome open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (lint-staged: MIT, awesome: CC0-1.0).
Where can I find alternatives to lint-staged or awesome?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at lint-staged alternatives and awesome alternatives (lint-staged markdown twin, awesome markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, lint-staged or awesome?
lint-staged: Very active. awesome: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for lint-staged and awesome?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: lint-staged trust report; awesome trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.