Home/Compare/agent-framework vs planning-with-files

Comparison

agent-framework vs planning-with-files

Verdict

Pick agent-framework if the agent-framework provides tools for developers to build and deploy AI agents and multi-agent workflows in Python and .NET environments; pick planning-with-files if a tool designed for providing persistent file-based planning in long-running AI coding tasks.

Markdown twin · agent-framework alternatives · planning-with-files alternatives

GraphCanon updated 2d

agent-framework logo

agent-framework

microsoft/agent-framework

13kpushed Aug 10, 2026
vs
planning-with-files logo

planning-with-files

OthmanAdi/planning-with-files

26kpushed Aug 19, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalagent-frameworkplanning-with-files
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of 1w · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of 2d · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 1w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 2d · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

agent-framework
Framework for building and deploying AI agents and multi-agent workflows
planning-with-files
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents

Stars

agent-framework
13k
planning-with-files
26k

Forks

agent-framework
2.1k
planning-with-files
2.2k

Open issues

agent-framework
685
planning-with-files
9

Language

agent-framework
Python
planning-with-files
Shell

Adopt for

agent-framework
The agent-framework provides tools for developers to build and deploy AI agents and multi-agent workflows in Python and .NET environments.
planning-with-files
A tool designed for providing persistent file-based planning in long-running AI coding tasks.

Persona

agent-framework
-
planning-with-files
-

Runtime

agent-framework
-
planning-with-files
-

License

agent-framework
MIT
planning-with-files
MIT

Last pushed

agent-framework
Aug 10, 2026
planning-with-files
Aug 19, 2026

Categories

agent-framework
AI Agents, Developer Tools
planning-with-files
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Open issues (now)

agent-framework
685
planning-with-files
9

Stars delta

agent-framework
Unknown
planning-with-files
+691 (30d)

Open issues delta

agent-framework
Unknown
planning-with-files
+4 (30d)

Owner type

agent-framework
Organization
planning-with-files
User

Full report

agent-framework
Trust report
planning-with-files
Trust report

Choose agent-framework if…

  • agent-framework is primarily Python; planning-with-files is Shell.
  • Requirements: Python version 3.6 or newer is required for Python installations.; The .NET Core SDK must be installed for utilizing the .NET packages..
  • Tags unique to agent-framework: agent-framework, agentic-ai, agents, multi-agent.
  • Choose agent-framework if your project requires support for both Python and .NET, allowing you to develop across different ecosystems.

When NOT to use agent-framework

  • Avoid using the agent-framework if your team does not have proficiency in either Python or.NET, as this may cause difficulties in leveraging its features effectively.
  • Do not opt for agent-framework if you only need lightweight support for AI agents without a comprehensive orchestration and deployment framework.

Choose planning-with-files if…

  • planning-with-files is primarily Shell; agent-framework is Python.
  • Pricing: Freely available under MIT License; community-supported..
  • Tags unique to planning-with-files: agent-skills, ai-agents, claude-code, codex.
  • - When your coding agent needs to retain plans across sessions without context loss.

When NOT to use planning-with-files

  • - When you do not need persistent storage for plans, such as short tasks where context is unlikely to be lost.
  • - For projects that strictly prohibit the use of external file storage for tracking progress due to security concerns.
  • - If your workflow heavily relies on in-memory planning strategies that are more suitable than disk-based solutions.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: agent-framework 13k · planning-with-files 26k (synced Aug 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between agent-framework and planning-with-files?
agent-framework: Framework for building and deploying AI agents and multi-agent workflows. planning-with-files: Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose agent-framework over planning-with-files?
Choose agent-framework over planning-with-files when agent-framework is primarily Python; planning-with-files is Shell; Requirements: Python version 3.6 or newer is required for Python installations.; The .NET Core SDK must be installed for utilizing the .NET packages.; Tags unique to agent-framework: agent-framework, agentic-ai, agents, multi-agent; Choose agent-framework if your project requires support for both Python and .NET, allowing you to develop across different ecosystems.
When should I choose planning-with-files over agent-framework?
Choose planning-with-files over agent-framework when planning-with-files is primarily Shell; agent-framework is Python; Pricing: Freely available under MIT License; community-supported.; Tags unique to planning-with-files: agent-skills, ai-agents, claude-code, codex; - When your coding agent needs to retain plans across sessions without context loss.
When should I avoid agent-framework?
Avoid using the agent-framework if your team does not have proficiency in either Python or.NET, as this may cause difficulties in leveraging its features effectively. Do not opt for agent-framework if you only need lightweight support for AI agents without a comprehensive orchestration and deployment framework.
When should I avoid planning-with-files?
- When you do not need persistent storage for plans, such as short tasks where context is unlikely to be lost. - For projects that strictly prohibit the use of external file storage for tracking progress due to security concerns. - If your workflow heavily relies on in-memory planning strategies that are more suitable than disk-based solutions.
Is agent-framework or planning-with-files more popular on GitHub?
planning-with-files has more GitHub stars (26,250 vs 12,718). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are agent-framework and planning-with-files open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (agent-framework: MIT, planning-with-files: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to agent-framework or planning-with-files?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at agent-framework alternatives and planning-with-files alternatives (agent-framework markdown twin, planning-with-files markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, agent-framework or planning-with-files?
agent-framework: Very active. planning-with-files: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for agent-framework and planning-with-files?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: agent-framework trust report; planning-with-files trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.