Home/Compare/moby vs code2prompt

Comparison

moby vs code2prompt

Verdict

Pick moby when moby is primarily Go; code2prompt is Rust; pick code2prompt when code2prompt is primarily Rust; moby is Go.

Markdown twin · moby alternatives · code2prompt alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

moby logo

moby

moby/moby

72kpushed Jul 10, 2026
vs
code2prompt logo

code2prompt

mufeedvh/code2prompt

7.5kpushed Jun 29, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalmobycode2prompt
Maintenance
Very active (1d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Active (11d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No criticals
As of today · osv@v1
No lockfile
As of today · none

Tagline

moby
The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems
code2prompt
A CLI tool to convert your codebase into a single LLM prompt with source tree, prompt templating, and token counting.

Stars

moby
72k
code2prompt
7.5k

Forks

moby
19k
code2prompt
426

Open issues

moby
3.8k
code2prompt
18

Language

moby
Go
code2prompt
Rust

Adopt for

moby
-
code2prompt
-

Persona

moby
-
code2prompt
-

Runtime

moby
-
code2prompt
-

License

moby
Apache-2.0
code2prompt
MIT

Last pushed

moby
Jul 10, 2026
code2prompt
Jun 29, 2026

Categories

moby
Developer Tools, Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks
code2prompt
Developer Tools, LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Maintenance

moby
Very active (96%)
code2prompt
Active (82%)

Days since push

moby
1d
code2prompt
11d

Open issues (now)

moby
3.8k
code2prompt
18

Owner type

moby
Organization
code2prompt
User

Security scan

moby
No criticals
code2prompt
No lockfile

Full report

code2prompt
Trust report

Choose moby if…

  • moby is primarily Go; code2prompt is Rust.
  • License: moby is Apache-2.0, code2prompt is MIT.
  • Tags unique to moby: containers, docker, go, golang.
  • Also covers Inference & Serving.
  • moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

When NOT to use moby

  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Choose code2prompt if…

  • code2prompt is primarily Rust; moby is Go.
  • License: code2prompt is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to code2prompt: ai, chatgpt, claude, cli.

When NOT to use code2prompt

  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: moby 72k · code2prompt 7.5k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between moby and code2prompt?
moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. code2prompt: A CLI tool to convert your codebase into a single LLM prompt with source tree, prompt templating, and token counting.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose moby over code2prompt?
Choose moby over code2prompt when moby is primarily Go; code2prompt is Rust; License: moby is Apache-2.0, code2prompt is MIT; Tags unique to moby: containers, docker, go, golang; Also covers Inference & Serving; moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When should I choose code2prompt over moby?
Choose code2prompt over moby when code2prompt is primarily Rust; moby is Go; License: code2prompt is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to code2prompt: ai, chatgpt, claude, cli.
When should I avoid moby?
Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
When should I avoid code2prompt?
Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
Is moby or code2prompt more popular on GitHub?
moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 7,467). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are moby and code2prompt open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (moby: Apache-2.0, code2prompt: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to moby or code2prompt?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at moby alternatives and code2prompt alternatives (moby markdown twin, code2prompt markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, moby or code2prompt?
moby: Very active. code2prompt: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for moby and code2prompt?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: moby trust report; code2prompt trust report.