Comparison
moby vs wllama
Verdict
Pick moby when moby is primarily Go; wllama is TypeScript; pick wllama when wllama is primarily TypeScript; moby is Go.
Markdown twin · moby alternatives · wllama alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
Trust & integrity
| Signal | moby | wllama |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (1d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Active (23d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | No criticals As of today · osv@v1 | 9 low (9 low) As of today · osv@v1 |
Tagline
- moby
- The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems
- wllama
- WebAssembly binding for llama.cpp - Enabling on-browser LLM inference
Stars
- moby
- 72k
- wllama
- 1.1k
Forks
- moby
- 19k
- wllama
- 106
Open issues
- moby
- 3.8k
- wllama
- 50
Language
- moby
- Go
- wllama
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- moby
- -
- wllama
- -
Persona
- moby
- -
- wllama
- -
Runtime
- moby
- -
- wllama
- -
License
- moby
- Apache-2.0
- wllama
- MIT
Last pushed
- moby
- Jul 10, 2026
- wllama
- Jun 17, 2026
Categories
- moby
- LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving
- wllama
- LLM Frameworks, Inference & Serving
Trust and health
Maintenance
- moby
- Very active (96%)
- wllama
- Active (82%)
Days since push
- moby
- 1d
- wllama
- 23d
Open issues (now)
- moby
- 3.8k
- wllama
- 50
Owner type
- moby
- Organization
- wllama
- User
Security scan
- moby
- No criticals
- wllama
- 9 low (9 low)
Full report
- moby
- Trust report
- wllama
- Trust report
Choose moby if…
- moby is primarily Go; wllama is TypeScript.
- License: moby is Apache-2.0, wllama is MIT.
- Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers.
- Also covers Developer Tools.
- moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When NOT to use moby
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Choose wllama if…
- wllama is primarily TypeScript; moby is Go.
- License: wllama is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to wllama: webassembly, llama, llm, llamacpp.
When NOT to use wllama
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (moby/moby) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (moby/moby) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (moby/moby) · observed Jul 10, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (ngxson/wllama) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (ngxson/wllama) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (ngxson/wllama) · observed Jun 17, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: moby 72k · wllama 1.1k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between moby and wllama?
- moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. wllama: WebAssembly binding for llama.cpp - Enabling on-browser LLM inference. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose moby over wllama?
- Choose moby over wllama when moby is primarily Go; wllama is TypeScript; License: moby is Apache-2.0, wllama is MIT; Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers; Also covers Developer Tools; moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When should I choose wllama over moby?
- Choose wllama over moby when wllama is primarily TypeScript; moby is Go; License: wllama is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to wllama: webassembly, llama, llm, llamacpp.
- When should I avoid moby?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
- When should I avoid wllama?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
- Is moby or wllama more popular on GitHub?
- moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 1,138). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are moby and wllama open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (moby: Apache-2.0, wllama: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to moby or wllama?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at moby alternatives and wllama alternatives (moby markdown twin, wllama markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, moby or wllama?
- moby: Very active. wllama: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for moby and wllama?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: moby trust report; wllama trust report.