Home/Compare/cve-mcp-server vs agents

Comparison

cve-mcp-server vs agents

Verdict

Pick cve-mcp-server when license: cve-mcp-server is Apache-2.0, agents is MIT; pick agents when license: agents is MIT, cve-mcp-server is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · cve-mcp-server alternatives · agents alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

cve-mcp-server logo

cve-mcp-server

mukul975/cve-mcp-server

1.1kpushed Jun 22, 2026
vs
agents logo

agents

wshobson/agents

38kpushed Jul 8, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalcve-mcp-serveragents
Maintenance
Active (18d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (2d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest

Tagline

cve-mcp-server
Production-grade MCP server giving Claude 27 security intelligence tools across 21 APIs — CVE lookup, EPSS scoring, CISA KEV, MITRE ATT&CK, Shodan, VirusTotal, and more.
agents
Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for various AI agents

Stars

cve-mcp-server
1.1k
agents
38k

Forks

cve-mcp-server
176
agents
4.0k

Open issues

cve-mcp-server
8
agents
1

Language

cve-mcp-server
Python
agents
Python

Adopt for

cve-mcp-server
-
agents
The agents tool is a marketplace for plugins that enhances multiple AI agents, offering integration and management capabilities across several platforms, including Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot

Persona

cve-mcp-server
-
agents
-

Runtime

cve-mcp-server
-
agents
-

License

cve-mcp-server
Apache-2.0
agents
MIT

Last pushed

cve-mcp-server
Jun 22, 2026
agents
Jul 8, 2026

Categories

cve-mcp-server
Developer Tools
agents
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

cve-mcp-server
Active (82%)
agents
Very active (96%)

Days since push

cve-mcp-server
18d
agents
2d

Open issues (now)

cve-mcp-server
8
agents
1

Full report

cve-mcp-server
Trust report

Choose cve-mcp-server if…

  • License: cve-mcp-server is Apache-2.0, agents is MIT.
  • Tags unique to cve-mcp-server: cve, cisa-kev, claude-ai, cybersecurity.

When NOT to use cve-mcp-server

  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Choose agents if…

  • License: agents is MIT, cve-mcp-server is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to agents: agent-skills, workflows, agentic-ai, prompt-engineering.
  • Also covers AI Agents.
  • You are working specifically within the ecosystems of Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, or Gemini CLI, as it provides tailored plugins for these environments

When NOT to use agents

  • You are working solely within a niche environment that isn't one of the supported platforms (like Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc.) because it may not offer compatible plugins or extensive support
  • Your project requirements do not include interoperability between multiple AI agents and you only need to leverage functionalities from a single AI agent with a robust in-built plugin ecosystem

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: cve-mcp-server 1.1k · agents 38k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between cve-mcp-server and agents?
cve-mcp-server: Production-grade MCP server giving Claude 27 security intelligence tools across 21 APIs — CVE lookup, EPSS scoring, CISA KEV, MITRE ATT&CK, Shodan, VirusTotal, and more.. agents: Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for various AI agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose cve-mcp-server over agents?
Choose cve-mcp-server over agents when License: cve-mcp-server is Apache-2.0, agents is MIT; Tags unique to cve-mcp-server: cve, cisa-kev, claude-ai, cybersecurity.
When should I choose agents over cve-mcp-server?
Choose agents over cve-mcp-server when License: agents is MIT, cve-mcp-server is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to agents: agent-skills, workflows, agentic-ai, prompt-engineering; Also covers AI Agents; You are working specifically within the ecosystems of Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, or Gemini CLI, as it provides tailored plugins for these environments.
When should I avoid cve-mcp-server?
Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid agents?
You are working solely within a niche environment that isn't one of the supported platforms (like Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc.) because it may not offer compatible plugins or extensive support Your project requirements do not include interoperability between multiple AI agents and you only need to leverage functionalities from a single AI agent with a robust in-built plugin ecosystem
Is cve-mcp-server or agents more popular on GitHub?
agents has more GitHub stars (37,779 vs 1,077). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are cve-mcp-server and agents open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (cve-mcp-server: Apache-2.0, agents: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to cve-mcp-server or agents?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cve-mcp-server alternatives and agents alternatives (cve-mcp-server markdown twin, agents markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, cve-mcp-server or agents?
cve-mcp-server: Active. agents: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for cve-mcp-server and agents?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cve-mcp-server trust report; agents trust report.