Comparison
nanobrowser vs AgentGPT
Verdict
Pick nanobrowser if nanobrowser is an open-source Chrome extension that facilitates AI-powered web automation through multi-agent workflows, requiring users to input their own LLM API keys. It stands out with a focus on cost-effective agent; pick AgentGPT if agentGPT is a TypeScript-based tool that supports users in assembling and deploying autonomous AI agents with a streamlined setup via a CLI.
Markdown twin · nanobrowser alternatives · AgentGPT alternatives
GraphCanon updated 1d
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | nanobrowser | AgentGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (1d since push) As of 1d · github_public_v1 | Archived (466d since push) As of 1w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 1d · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 1w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11 As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- nanobrowser
- Open-Source Chrome extension for AI-powered web automation
- AgentGPT
- Assembler for autonomous AI Agents
Stars
- nanobrowser
- 14k
- AgentGPT
- 36k
Forks
- nanobrowser
- 1.4k
- AgentGPT
- 9.3k
Open issues
- nanobrowser
- 74
- AgentGPT
- 219
Language
- nanobrowser
- TypeScript
- AgentGPT
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- nanobrowser
- Nanobrowser is an open-source Chrome extension that facilitates AI-powered web automation through multi-agent workflows, requiring users to input their own LLM API keys. It stands out with a focus on cost-effective agent
- AgentGPT
- AgentGPT is a TypeScript-based tool that supports users in assembling and deploying autonomous AI agents with a streamlined setup via a CLI, suitable for those who prefer browser-based interactions with their AI projects
Persona
- nanobrowser
- -
- AgentGPT
- -
Runtime
- nanobrowser
- -
- AgentGPT
- -
License
- nanobrowser
- Apache-2.0
- AgentGPT
- GPL-3.0
Last pushed
- nanobrowser
- Aug 18, 2026
- AgentGPT
- Apr 29, 2025
Categories
- nanobrowser
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
- AgentGPT
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
Trust and health
Maintenance
- nanobrowser
- Very active (96%)
- AgentGPT
- Archived (8%)
Days since push
- nanobrowser
- 1d
- AgentGPT
- 466d
Archived on GitHub
- nanobrowser
- No
- AgentGPT
- Yes
Open issues (now)
- nanobrowser
- 74
- AgentGPT
- 219
Stars delta
- nanobrowser
- +96 (30d)
- AgentGPT
- Unknown
Open issues delta
- nanobrowser
- +4 (30d)
- AgentGPT
- Unknown
OSV dependency advisories
- nanobrowser
- No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
- AgentGPT
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- nanobrowser
- Trust report
- AgentGPT
- Trust report
Choose nanobrowser if…
- License: nanobrowser is Apache-2.0, AgentGPT is GPL-3.0.
- Tags unique to nanobrowser: ai-tools, automation, browser-automation.
- When you are looking for a flexible configuration of multiple agents in web automation tasks and want to avoid the limitations present in the Chrome Web Store version.
When NOT to use nanobrowser
- If you strictly require a fully managed solution without needing to input API keys and managing configurations.
- Not recommended if your tasks can be handled efficiently by simpler tools, as Nanobrowser's advanced configuration might introduce unnecessary complexity.
- Avoid this tool if automatic updates are crucial for your workflow since updating through the Chrome Web Store may lag due to review processes.
Choose AgentGPT if…
- License: AgentGPT is GPL-3.0, nanobrowser is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to AgentGPT: autonomous, backend-development, cli-setup, database-integration.
- AgentGPT ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you want to leverage pre-configured setups for database integration (specifically MySQL) handled by AgentGPT's CLI
When NOT to use AgentGPT
- Avoid using if your project requires a NoSQL database solution, given that AgentGPT is configured specifically with MySQL out-of-the-box
- Consider alternatives if your stack does not include FastAPI or Next.js, as the tool's default configurations might require significant adjustment
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (nanobrowser/nanobrowser) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- GitHub forks (nanobrowser/nanobrowser) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- Last push (nanobrowser/nanobrowser) · observed Aug 18, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (reworkd/AgentGPT) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- GitHub forks (reworkd/AgentGPT) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Last push (reworkd/AgentGPT) · observed Apr 29, 2025
- License file (GPL-3.0) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: nanobrowser 14k · AgentGPT 36k (synced Aug 19, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between nanobrowser and AgentGPT?
- nanobrowser: Open-Source Chrome extension for AI-powered web automation. AgentGPT: Assembler for autonomous AI Agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose nanobrowser over AgentGPT?
- Choose nanobrowser over AgentGPT when License: nanobrowser is Apache-2.0, AgentGPT is GPL-3.0; Tags unique to nanobrowser: ai-tools, automation, browser-automation; When you are looking for a flexible configuration of multiple agents in web automation tasks and want to avoid the limitations present in the Chrome Web Store version.
- When should I choose AgentGPT over nanobrowser?
- Choose AgentGPT over nanobrowser when License: AgentGPT is GPL-3.0, nanobrowser is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to AgentGPT: autonomous, backend-development, cli-setup, database-integration; AgentGPT ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you want to leverage pre-configured setups for database integration (specifically MySQL) handled by AgentGPT's CLI.
- When should I avoid nanobrowser?
- If you strictly require a fully managed solution without needing to input API keys and managing configurations. Not recommended if your tasks can be handled efficiently by simpler tools, as Nanobrowser's advanced configuration might introduce unnecessary complexity. Avoid this tool if automatic updates are crucial for your workflow since updating through the Chrome Web Store may lag due to review processes.
- When should I avoid AgentGPT?
- Avoid using if your project requires a NoSQL database solution, given that AgentGPT is configured specifically with MySQL out-of-the-box Consider alternatives if your stack does not include FastAPI or Next.js, as the tool's default configurations might require significant adjustment
- Is nanobrowser or AgentGPT more popular on GitHub?
- AgentGPT has more GitHub stars (36,304 vs 13,575). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are nanobrowser and AgentGPT open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (nanobrowser: Apache-2.0, AgentGPT: GPL-3.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to nanobrowser or AgentGPT?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at nanobrowser alternatives and AgentGPT alternatives (nanobrowser markdown twin, AgentGPT markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, nanobrowser or AgentGPT?
- nanobrowser: Very active. AgentGPT: Archived. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for nanobrowser and AgentGPT?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: nanobrowser trust report; AgentGPT trust report.