GraphCanon
Home/Compare/just-eval vs auto-evaluator

Comparison

just-eval vs auto-evaluator

Verdict

Pick just-eval if just-eval provides a straightforward GPT-based framework for evaluating LLMs across multiple dimensions with clear outputs; pick auto-evaluator if auto-evaluator is a Python-based tool designed for evaluating LLM QA chains with the capability to auto-generate question-answer pairs from user-provided documents and evaluate answers using configurations chosen via UI.

Markdown twin · just-eval alternatives · auto-evaluator alternatives

GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026

11views this month

just-eval logo

just-eval

Re-Align/just-eval

★ 90pushed Jan 29, 2024
vs
auto-evaluator logo

auto-evaluator

rlancemartin/auto-evaluator

★ 1.1kpushed May 10, 2023

Trust & integrity

Signaljust-evalauto-evaluator
Maintenance
Dormant (953d since push)
As of Sep 9, 2026 · github_public_v1
Dormant (1216d since push)
As of Sep 8, 2026 · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 9, 2026 · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of Sep 8, 2026 · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1
Published findings
As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
just-eval trust reportauto-evaluator trust reportTrust methodology

Tagline

just-eval
A simple GPT-based evaluation tool for multi-aspect, interpretable assessment of LLMs.
auto-evaluator
A lightweight evaluation tool for question-answering using Langchain

Stars

just-eval
90
auto-evaluator
1.1k

Forks

just-eval
7
auto-evaluator
92

Open issues

just-eval
2
auto-evaluator
3

Language

just-eval
Python
auto-evaluator
Python

Adopt for

just-eval
just-eval provides a straightforward GPT-based framework for evaluating LLMs across multiple dimensions with clear outputs.
auto-evaluator
Auto-evaluator is a Python-based tool designed for evaluating LLM QA chains with the capability to auto-generate question-answer pairs from user-provided documents and evaluate answers using configurations chosen via UI.

Persona

just-eval
-
auto-evaluator
-

Runtime

just-eval
-
auto-evaluator
-

License

just-eval
MIT
auto-evaluator
-

Last pushed

just-eval
Jan 29, 2024
auto-evaluator
May 10, 2023

Categories

just-eval
Evaluation & Observability
auto-evaluator
Evaluation & Observability

Trust and health

Days since push

just-eval
953d
auto-evaluator
1216d

Open issues (now)

just-eval
2
auto-evaluator
3

Stars delta

just-eval
0 (30d)
auto-evaluator
-3 (30d)

Owner type

just-eval
Organization
auto-evaluator
User

OSV dependency advisories

just-eval
No lockfile (source not queried)
auto-evaluator
Published findings

Full report

just-eval
Trust report
auto-evaluator
Trust report

Shared compatibility

  • OpenAI API · just-eval: OpenAI API · auto-evaluator: OpenAI API
  • Python · just-eval: Python runtime · auto-evaluator: Python runtime

Choose just-eval if…

  • Tags unique to just-eval: gpt4, llm-eval, llm-evaluation, llm-evaluation-toolkit.
  • When your team requires an in-depth yet interpretable evaluation of LLM performance, focusing on various aspects.
  • More recently updated (last pushed Jan 29, 2024).

When NOT to use just-eval

  • Avoid if direct integration with competing API services is needed as just-eval focuses solely on OpenAI API key configuration.
  • Not suitable when your project demands a custom evaluation framework that extends beyond simple GPT-based assessments.
GitHubDetails

Choose auto-evaluator if…

  • Tags unique to auto-evaluator: gpt-3.5-turbo, langchain, question-answering.
  • Use when you need a lightweight solution for testing question-answering capabilities of Langchain models.
  • More GitHub stars (1.1k vs 90) - visibility, not fit.

When NOT to use auto-evaluator

  • Avoid using this tool when you do not have access to an OpenAI API key providing access to GPT-4, as it uses that by default for optimal settings.
  • If you are looking for a tool that does not require you to input documents for question generation and prefer a more customized prompt approach rather than the auto-generation feature.
GitHubDetails

Explore

just-eval trust report →auto-evaluator trust report →Evaluation & Observability category →All comparisonsStack workflowsTrending tools

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: just-eval 90 · auto-evaluator 1.1k (synced Sep 20, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between just-eval and auto-evaluator?
just-eval: A simple GPT-based evaluation tool for multi-aspect, interpretable assessment of LLMs.. auto-evaluator: A lightweight evaluation tool for question-answering using Langchain. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose just-eval over auto-evaluator?
Choose just-eval over auto-evaluator when Tags unique to just-eval: gpt4, llm-eval, llm-evaluation, llm-evaluation-toolkit; When your team requires an in-depth yet interpretable evaluation of LLM performance, focusing on various aspects; More recently updated (last pushed Jan 29, 2024).
When should I choose auto-evaluator over just-eval?
Choose auto-evaluator over just-eval when Tags unique to auto-evaluator: gpt-3.5-turbo, langchain, question-answering; Use when you need a lightweight solution for testing question-answering capabilities of Langchain models; More GitHub stars (1.1k vs 90) - visibility, not fit.
When should I avoid just-eval?
Avoid if direct integration with competing API services is needed as just-eval focuses solely on OpenAI API key configuration. Not suitable when your project demands a custom evaluation framework that extends beyond simple GPT-based assessments.
When should I avoid auto-evaluator?
Avoid using this tool when you do not have access to an OpenAI API key providing access to GPT-4, as it uses that by default for optimal settings. If you are looking for a tool that does not require you to input documents for question generation and prefer a more customized prompt approach rather than the auto-generation feature.
Is just-eval or auto-evaluator more popular on GitHub?
auto-evaluator has more GitHub stars (1,102 vs 90). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are just-eval and auto-evaluator open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.
Where can I find alternatives to just-eval or auto-evaluator?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at just-eval alternatives and auto-evaluator alternatives (just-eval markdown twin, auto-evaluator markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, just-eval or auto-evaluator?
just-eval: Dormant. auto-evaluator: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for just-eval and auto-evaluator?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: just-eval trust report; auto-evaluator trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.