Comparison
AgentGPT vs WeaveBench
Verdict
Pick AgentGPT if agentGPT is a TypeScript-based tool that supports users in assembling and deploying autonomous AI agents with a streamlined setup via a CLI, suitable for those who prefer browser-based interactions with their AI projects; pick WeaveBench if weaveBench is designed for evaluating computer-use agents that integrate both GUI and CLI interactions in real-world scenarios across various work domains.
Markdown twin · AgentGPT alternatives · WeaveBench alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | AgentGPT | WeaveBench |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Archived (466d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Very active (6d since push) As of 3w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 3w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 | Published findings As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- AgentGPT
- Assembler for autonomous AI Agents
- WeaveBench
- A Long-Horizon Real-World Benchmark for Computer-Use Agents with Hybrid Interfaces
Stars
- AgentGPT
- 36k
- WeaveBench
- 157
Forks
- AgentGPT
- 9.3k
- WeaveBench
- 1
Open issues
- AgentGPT
- 219
- WeaveBench
- 4
Language
- AgentGPT
- TypeScript
- WeaveBench
- Python
Adopt for
- AgentGPT
- AgentGPT is a TypeScript-based tool that supports users in assembling and deploying autonomous AI agents with a streamlined setup via a CLI, suitable for those who prefer browser-based interactions with their AI projects
- WeaveBench
- WeaveBench is designed for evaluating computer-use agents that integrate both GUI and CLI interactions in real-world scenarios across various work domains.
Persona
- AgentGPT
- -
- WeaveBench
- -
Runtime
- AgentGPT
- -
- WeaveBench
- -
License
- AgentGPT
- GPL-3.0
- WeaveBench
- MIT
Last pushed
- AgentGPT
- Apr 29, 2025
- WeaveBench
- Jul 22, 2026
Categories
- AgentGPT
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
- WeaveBench
- AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- AgentGPT
- Archived (8%)
- WeaveBench
- Very active (96%)
Days since push
- AgentGPT
- 466d
- WeaveBench
- 6d
Archived on GitHub
- AgentGPT
- Yes
- WeaveBench
- No
Open issues (now)
- AgentGPT
- 219
- WeaveBench
- 4
OSV dependency advisories
- AgentGPT
- No lockfile (source not queried)
- WeaveBench
- Published findings
Full report
- AgentGPT
- Trust report
- WeaveBench
- Trust report
Choose AgentGPT if…
- AgentGPT is primarily TypeScript; WeaveBench is Python.
- License: AgentGPT is GPL-3.0, WeaveBench is MIT.
- Tags unique to AgentGPT: agent, autonomous, backend-development, cli-setup.
- Also covers Developer Tools.
- AgentGPT ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you want to leverage pre-configured setups for database integration (specifically MySQL) handled by AgentGPT's CLI
When NOT to use AgentGPT
- Avoid using if your project requires a NoSQL database solution, given that AgentGPT is configured specifically with MySQL out-of-the-box
- Consider alternatives if your stack does not include FastAPI or Next.js, as the tool's default configurations might require significant adjustment
Choose WeaveBench if…
- WeaveBench is primarily Python; AgentGPT is TypeScript.
- License: WeaveBench is MIT, AgentGPT is GPL-3.0.
- Tags unique to WeaveBench: agent-as-judge, benchmark, computer-use-agent, gui-agent.
- Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
- Use WeaveBench if you need to assess agents capable of handling tasks that require intermingling graphical user interface operations with command-line or code-based actions.
When NOT to use WeaveBench
- Avoid WeaveBench if your testing needs do not involve scenarios that require the integration of both GUI and CLI operations.
- Do not use it when you are specifically interested only in benchmarking agents designed for single-channel tasks, either strictly CLI-based or purely graphical interface-driven.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (reworkd/AgentGPT) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- GitHub forks (reworkd/AgentGPT) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Last push (reworkd/AgentGPT) · observed Apr 29, 2025
- License file (GPL-3.0) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (weavebench/WeaveBench) · observed Jul 29, 2026
- GitHub forks (weavebench/WeaveBench) · observed Jul 29, 2026
- Last push (weavebench/WeaveBench) · observed Jul 22, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 29, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: AgentGPT 36k · WeaveBench 157 (synced Aug 8, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between AgentGPT and WeaveBench?
- AgentGPT: Assembler for autonomous AI Agents. WeaveBench: A Long-Horizon Real-World Benchmark for Computer-Use Agents with Hybrid Interfaces. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose AgentGPT over WeaveBench?
- Choose AgentGPT over WeaveBench when AgentGPT is primarily TypeScript; WeaveBench is Python; License: AgentGPT is GPL-3.0, WeaveBench is MIT; Tags unique to AgentGPT: agent, autonomous, backend-development, cli-setup; Also covers Developer Tools; AgentGPT ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you want to leverage pre-configured setups for database integration (specifically MySQL) handled by AgentGPT's CLI.
- When should I choose WeaveBench over AgentGPT?
- Choose WeaveBench over AgentGPT when WeaveBench is primarily Python; AgentGPT is TypeScript; License: WeaveBench is MIT, AgentGPT is GPL-3.0; Tags unique to WeaveBench: agent-as-judge, benchmark, computer-use-agent, gui-agent; Also covers Evaluation & Observability; Use WeaveBench if you need to assess agents capable of handling tasks that require intermingling graphical user interface operations with command-line or code-based actions.
- When should I avoid AgentGPT?
- Avoid using if your project requires a NoSQL database solution, given that AgentGPT is configured specifically with MySQL out-of-the-box Consider alternatives if your stack does not include FastAPI or Next.js, as the tool's default configurations might require significant adjustment
- When should I avoid WeaveBench?
- Avoid WeaveBench if your testing needs do not involve scenarios that require the integration of both GUI and CLI operations. Do not use it when you are specifically interested only in benchmarking agents designed for single-channel tasks, either strictly CLI-based or purely graphical interface-driven.
- Is AgentGPT or WeaveBench more popular on GitHub?
- AgentGPT has more GitHub stars (36,304 vs 157). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are AgentGPT and WeaveBench open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (AgentGPT: GPL-3.0, WeaveBench: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to AgentGPT or WeaveBench?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at AgentGPT alternatives and WeaveBench alternatives (AgentGPT markdown twin, WeaveBench markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, AgentGPT or WeaveBench?
- AgentGPT: Archived. WeaveBench: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for AgentGPT and WeaveBench?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: AgentGPT trust report; WeaveBench trust report.