Comparison
ChatGPT-Shortcut vs awesome
Verdict
Pick ChatGPT-Shortcut when license: ChatGPT-Shortcut is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0; pick awesome when license: awesome is CC0-1.0, ChatGPT-Shortcut is MIT.
Markdown twin · ChatGPT-Shortcut alternatives · awesome alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | ChatGPT-Shortcut | awesome |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (1d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Active (11d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | No lockfile As of today · none | No lockfile As of today · none |
Tagline
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- 🚀💪Maximize your efficiency and productivity. The ultimate hub to manage, customize, and share prompts. (English/中文/Español/العربية). 让生产力加倍的 AI 快捷指令。更高效地管理提示词，在分享社区中发现适用于不同场景的灵感。
- awesome
- 😎 Curated list of awesome topics including hardware resources
Stars
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- 8.6k
- awesome
- 484k
Forks
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- 945
- awesome
- 36k
Open issues
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- 0
- awesome
- 92
Language
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- TypeScript
- awesome
- -
Adopt for
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- -
- awesome
- -
Persona
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- -
- awesome
- -
Runtime
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- -
- awesome
- -
License
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- MIT
- awesome
- CC0-1.0
Last pushed
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- Jul 10, 2026
- awesome
- Jun 30, 2026
Categories
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- LLM Frameworks
- awesome
- LLM Frameworks
Trust and health
Maintenance
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- Very active (96%)
- awesome
- Active (82%)
Days since push
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- 1d
- awesome
- 11d
Open issues (now)
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- 0
- awesome
- 92
Full report
- ChatGPT-Shortcut
- Trust report
- awesome
- Trust report
Choose ChatGPT-Shortcut if…
- License: ChatGPT-Shortcut is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0.
- Tags unique to ChatGPT-Shortcut: ai, ai-tools, aigc, chatgpt.
- More recently updated (last pushed Jul 10, 2026).
When NOT to use ChatGPT-Shortcut
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
Choose awesome if…
- License: awesome is CC0-1.0, ChatGPT-Shortcut is MIT.
- Tags unique to awesome: awesome-list, resources.
- More GitHub stars (484k vs 8.6k) - visibility, not fit.
When NOT to use awesome
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (rockbenben/ChatGPT-Shortcut) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (rockbenben/ChatGPT-Shortcut) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (rockbenben/ChatGPT-Shortcut) · observed Jul 10, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (sindresorhus/awesome) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (sindresorhus/awesome) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (sindresorhus/awesome) · observed Jun 30, 2026
- License file (CC0-1.0) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: ChatGPT-Shortcut 8.6k · awesome 484k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between ChatGPT-Shortcut and awesome?
- ChatGPT-Shortcut: 🚀💪Maximize your efficiency and productivity. The ultimate hub to manage, customize, and share prompts. (English/中文/Español/العربية). 让生产力加倍的 AI 快捷指令。更高效地管理提示词，在分享社区中发现适用于不同场景的灵感。. awesome: 😎 Curated list of awesome topics including hardware resources. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose ChatGPT-Shortcut over awesome?
- Choose ChatGPT-Shortcut over awesome when License: ChatGPT-Shortcut is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0; Tags unique to ChatGPT-Shortcut: ai, ai-tools, aigc, chatgpt; More recently updated (last pushed Jul 10, 2026).
- When should I choose awesome over ChatGPT-Shortcut?
- Choose awesome over ChatGPT-Shortcut when License: awesome is CC0-1.0, ChatGPT-Shortcut is MIT; Tags unique to awesome: awesome-list, resources; More GitHub stars (484k vs 8.6k) - visibility, not fit.
- When should I avoid ChatGPT-Shortcut?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- When should I avoid awesome?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Is ChatGPT-Shortcut or awesome more popular on GitHub?
- awesome has more GitHub stars (484,026 vs 8,607). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are ChatGPT-Shortcut and awesome open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (ChatGPT-Shortcut: MIT, awesome: CC0-1.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to ChatGPT-Shortcut or awesome?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at ChatGPT-Shortcut alternatives and awesome alternatives (ChatGPT-Shortcut markdown twin, awesome markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, ChatGPT-Shortcut or awesome?
- ChatGPT-Shortcut: Very active. awesome: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for ChatGPT-Shortcut and awesome?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: ChatGPT-Shortcut trust report; awesome trust report.