Home/Compare/SpiffWorkflow vs agents

Comparison

SpiffWorkflow vs agents

Verdict

Pick SpiffWorkflow when license: SpiffWorkflow is LGPL-3.0, agents is MIT; pick agents when license: agents is MIT, SpiffWorkflow is LGPL-3.0.

Markdown twin · SpiffWorkflow alternatives · agents alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

SpiffWorkflow logo

SpiffWorkflow

sartography/SpiffWorkflow

1.9kpushed Jul 12, 2026
vs
agents logo

agents

wshobson/agents

38kpushed Jul 8, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalSpiffWorkflowagents
Maintenance
Very active (2d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (2d since push)
As of 4d · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 4d · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of today · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 4d · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

SpiffWorkflow
A powerful workflow engine implemented in pure Python
agents
Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for various AI agents

Stars

SpiffWorkflow
1.9k
agents
38k

Forks

SpiffWorkflow
339
agents
4.0k

Open issues

SpiffWorkflow
9
agents
1

Language

SpiffWorkflow
Python
agents
Python

Adopt for

SpiffWorkflow
-
agents
The agents tool is a marketplace for plugins that enhances multiple AI agents, offering integration and management capabilities across several platforms, including Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot

Persona

SpiffWorkflow
-
agents
-

Runtime

SpiffWorkflow
-
agents
-

License

SpiffWorkflow
LGPL-3.0
agents
MIT

Last pushed

SpiffWorkflow
Jul 12, 2026
agents
Jul 8, 2026

Categories

SpiffWorkflow
Developer Tools
agents
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Open issues (now)

SpiffWorkflow
9
agents
1

Owner type

SpiffWorkflow
Organization
agents
User

Full report

SpiffWorkflow
Trust report

Choose SpiffWorkflow if…

  • License: SpiffWorkflow is LGPL-3.0, agents is MIT.
  • Tags unique to SpiffWorkflow: bpmn, bpmn-engine, python, spiff-workflow.
  • SpiffWorkflow ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

When NOT to use SpiffWorkflow

  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Choose agents if…

  • License: agents is MIT, SpiffWorkflow is LGPL-3.0.
  • Tags unique to agents: agent-skills, agentic-ai, automation, prompt-engineering.
  • Also covers AI Agents.
  • You are working specifically within the ecosystems of Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, or Gemini CLI, as it provides tailored plugins for these environments

When NOT to use agents

  • You are working solely within a niche environment that isn't one of the supported platforms (like Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc.) because it may not offer compatible plugins or extensive support
  • Your project requirements do not include interoperability between multiple AI agents and you only need to leverage functionalities from a single AI agent with a robust in-built plugin ecosystem

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: SpiffWorkflow 1.9k · agents 38k (synced Jul 15, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between SpiffWorkflow and agents?
SpiffWorkflow: A powerful workflow engine implemented in pure Python. agents: Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for various AI agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose SpiffWorkflow over agents?
Choose SpiffWorkflow over agents when License: SpiffWorkflow is LGPL-3.0, agents is MIT; Tags unique to SpiffWorkflow: bpmn, bpmn-engine, python, spiff-workflow; SpiffWorkflow ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When should I choose agents over SpiffWorkflow?
Choose agents over SpiffWorkflow when License: agents is MIT, SpiffWorkflow is LGPL-3.0; Tags unique to agents: agent-skills, agentic-ai, automation, prompt-engineering; Also covers AI Agents; You are working specifically within the ecosystems of Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, or Gemini CLI, as it provides tailored plugins for these environments.
When should I avoid SpiffWorkflow?
Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid agents?
You are working solely within a niche environment that isn't one of the supported platforms (like Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc.) because it may not offer compatible plugins or extensive support Your project requirements do not include interoperability between multiple AI agents and you only need to leverage functionalities from a single AI agent with a robust in-built plugin ecosystem
Is SpiffWorkflow or agents more popular on GitHub?
agents has more GitHub stars (37,779 vs 1,903). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are SpiffWorkflow and agents open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (SpiffWorkflow: LGPL-3.0, agents: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to SpiffWorkflow or agents?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at SpiffWorkflow alternatives and agents alternatives (SpiffWorkflow markdown twin, agents markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, SpiffWorkflow or agents?
SpiffWorkflow: Very active. agents: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for SpiffWorkflow and agents?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: SpiffWorkflow trust report; agents trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.