Comparison
AI-Infra-Guard vs gateway
Verdict
Pick AI-Infra-Guard if aI-Infra-Guard is designed for organizations looking to secure their AI infrastructures comprehensively through various scanning and evaluation tools; pick gateway if self-hosted firewall for securing AI applications with guardrails and content moderation.
Markdown twin · AI-Infra-Guard alternatives · gateway alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | AI-Infra-Guard | gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of 4w · github_public_v1 | Dormant (410d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 4w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- AI-Infra-Guard
- A full-stack AI Red Teaming platform securing AI ecosystems
- gateway
- Self-hosted firewall for securing AI applications with guardrails and content moderation.
Stars
- AI-Infra-Guard
- 4.3k
- gateway
- 127
Forks
- AI-Infra-Guard
- 419
- gateway
- 12
Open issues
- AI-Infra-Guard
- 13
- gateway
- 0
Language
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Python
- gateway
- Python
Adopt for
- AI-Infra-Guard
- AI-Infra-Guard is designed for organizations looking to secure their AI infrastructures comprehensively through various scanning and evaluation tools.
- gateway
- Self-hosted firewall for securing AI applications with guardrails and content moderation.
Persona
- AI-Infra-Guard
- -
- gateway
- -
Runtime
- AI-Infra-Guard
- -
- gateway
- -
License
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Apache-2.0
- gateway
- Other
Last pushed
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Jul 28, 2026
- gateway
- Jun 25, 2025
Categories
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks
- gateway
- Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks
Trust and health
Maintenance
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Very active (96%)
- gateway
- Dormant (18%)
Days since push
- AI-Infra-Guard
- 0d
- gateway
- 410d
Open issues (now)
- AI-Infra-Guard
- 13
- gateway
- 0
Full report
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Trust report
- gateway
- Trust report
Choose AI-Infra-Guard if…
- License: AI-Infra-Guard is Apache-2.0, gateway is Other.
- Tags unique to AI-Infra-Guard: agent-security, ai-red-teaming, llm-evaluation, security-tools.
- If you need advanced LLM jailbreak evaluation capabilities specific to the vulnerabilities identified by Tencent's research, consider using AI-Infra-Guard.
When NOT to use AI-Infra-Guard
- Avoid if you are looking exclusively for a tool that focuses solely on the runtime behavior of LLMs without broader infrastructural scanning capabilities.
- Not recommended when your primary focus is on network-level security rather than comprehensive AI infrastructure security assessments and evaluations.
Choose gateway if…
- License: gateway is Other, AI-Infra-Guard is Apache-2.0.
- Pricing: Open-source with no explicit monetary cost, but requires users to handle infrastructure costs associated with local Docker deployment.
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Docker and Docker Compose are required for deployment; Initial launch takes several minutes due to downloading machine learning models (~1.5GB+) for the first time.
- Tags unique to gateway: content-moderation, docker-compose, guardrails, pii-redaction.
- When you need to self-host a secure gateway for LLM-based AI applications that requires local deployment via Docker
When NOT to use gateway
- Avoid if you are looking for cloud-managed services, as this tool is designed solely for local or self-hosted environments
- Not suitable if you require extensive customization beyond the provided policies.yaml file and predefined guardrails for content moderation and security
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (Tencent/AI-Infra-Guard) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- GitHub forks (Tencent/AI-Infra-Guard) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- Last push (Tencent/AI-Infra-Guard) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (trylonai/gateway) · observed Aug 10, 2026
- GitHub forks (trylonai/gateway) · observed Aug 10, 2026
- Last push (trylonai/gateway) · observed Jun 25, 2025
- License file (Other) · observed Aug 10, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: AI-Infra-Guard 4.3k · gateway 127 (synced Jul 28, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between AI-Infra-Guard and gateway?
- AI-Infra-Guard: A full-stack AI Red Teaming platform securing AI ecosystems. gateway: Self-hosted firewall for securing AI applications with guardrails and content moderation.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose AI-Infra-Guard over gateway?
- Choose AI-Infra-Guard over gateway when License: AI-Infra-Guard is Apache-2.0, gateway is Other; Tags unique to AI-Infra-Guard: agent-security, ai-red-teaming, llm-evaluation, security-tools; If you need advanced LLM jailbreak evaluation capabilities specific to the vulnerabilities identified by Tencent's research, consider using AI-Infra-Guard.
- When should I choose gateway over AI-Infra-Guard?
- Choose gateway over AI-Infra-Guard when License: gateway is Other, AI-Infra-Guard is Apache-2.0; Pricing: Open-source with no explicit monetary cost, but requires users to handle infrastructure costs associated with local Docker deployment; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Docker and Docker Compose are required for deployment; Initial launch takes several minutes due to downloading machine learning models (~1.5GB+) for the first time; Tags unique to gateway: content-moderation, docker-compose, guardrails, pii-redaction; When you need to self-host a secure gateway for LLM-based AI applications that requires local deployment via Docker.
- When should I avoid AI-Infra-Guard?
- Avoid if you are looking exclusively for a tool that focuses solely on the runtime behavior of LLMs without broader infrastructural scanning capabilities. Not recommended when your primary focus is on network-level security rather than comprehensive AI infrastructure security assessments and evaluations.
- When should I avoid gateway?
- Avoid if you are looking for cloud-managed services, as this tool is designed solely for local or self-hosted environments Not suitable if you require extensive customization beyond the provided policies.yaml file and predefined guardrails for content moderation and security
- Is AI-Infra-Guard or gateway more popular on GitHub?
- AI-Infra-Guard has more GitHub stars (4,316 vs 127). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are AI-Infra-Guard and gateway open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (AI-Infra-Guard: Apache-2.0, gateway: Other).
- Where can I find alternatives to AI-Infra-Guard or gateway?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at AI-Infra-Guard alternatives and gateway alternatives (AI-Infra-Guard markdown twin, gateway markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, AI-Infra-Guard or gateway?
- AI-Infra-Guard: Very active. gateway: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for AI-Infra-Guard and gateway?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: AI-Infra-Guard trust report; gateway trust report.