Comparison
stealth-browser-mcp vs agents
Verdict
Pick stealth-browser-mcp if stealth-Browser-MCP is an AI-powered tool for browser automation that focuses on evading anti-bot systems while automating human-like interactions; pick agents if the agents tool is a marketplace for plugins that enhances multiple AI agents, offering integration and management capabilities across several platforms, including Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot.
Markdown twin · stealth-browser-mcp alternatives · agents alternatives
GraphCanon updated 5d
Trust & integrity
| Signal | stealth-browser-mcp | agents |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (2d since push) As of 4w · github_public_v1 | Very active (1d since push) As of 5d · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of 4w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of 5d · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- stealth-browser-mcp
- AI-powered browser automation that bypasses anti-bot systems
- agents
- Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for various AI agents
Stars
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 1.6k
- agents
- 39k
Forks
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 235
- agents
- 4.1k
Open issues
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 2
- agents
- 5
Language
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Python
- agents
- Python
Adopt for
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Stealth-Browser-MCP is an AI-powered tool for browser automation that focuses on evading anti-bot systems while automating human-like interactions.
- agents
- The agents tool is a marketplace for plugins that enhances multiple AI agents, offering integration and management capabilities across several platforms, including Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot
Persona
- stealth-browser-mcp
- -
- agents
- -
Runtime
- stealth-browser-mcp
- -
- agents
- -
License
- stealth-browser-mcp
- MIT
- agents
- MIT
Last pushed
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Jul 24, 2026
- agents
- Aug 18, 2026
Categories
- stealth-browser-mcp
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
- agents
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
Trust and health
Days since push
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 2d
- agents
- 1d
Open issues (now)
- stealth-browser-mcp
- 2
- agents
- 5
Stars delta
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Unknown
- agents
- +860 (30d)
Open issues delta
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Unknown
- agents
- +2 (30d)
Full report
- stealth-browser-mcp
- Trust report
- agents
- Trust report
Choose stealth-browser-mcp if…
- Tags unique to stealth-browser-mcp: ai-agents, anti-bot-bypass, browser-automation, web-scraping.
- stealth-browser-mcp ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you need to automate tasks that require bypassing advanced anti-bot detection mechanisms.
When NOT to use stealth-browser-mcp
- If your browser automation requirements do not involve evading sophisticated anti-bot systems or mimicking human behavior closely enough to trick such defenses.
- When the tool's specific approach, which includes AI-generated network hooks and UI cloning, is unnecessary for task completion because simpler solutions can suffice.
Choose agents if…
- Tags unique to agents: agent-skills, agentic-ai, automation, prompt-engineering.
- You are working specifically within the ecosystems of Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, or Gemini CLI, as it provides tailored plugins for these environments
- More GitHub stars (39k vs 1.6k) - visibility, not fit.
When NOT to use agents
- You are working solely within a niche environment that isn't one of the supported platforms (like Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc.) because it may not offer compatible plugins or extensive support
- Your project requirements do not include interoperability between multiple AI agents and you only need to leverage functionalities from a single AI agent with a robust in-built plugin ecosystem
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (vibheksoni/stealth-browser-mcp) · observed Jul 27, 2026
- GitHub forks (vibheksoni/stealth-browser-mcp) · observed Jul 27, 2026
- Last push (vibheksoni/stealth-browser-mcp) · observed Jul 24, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 27, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (wshobson/agents) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- GitHub forks (wshobson/agents) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- Last push (wshobson/agents) · observed Aug 18, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: stealth-browser-mcp 1.6k · agents 39k (synced Jul 27, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between stealth-browser-mcp and agents?
- stealth-browser-mcp: AI-powered browser automation that bypasses anti-bot systems. agents: Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for various AI agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose stealth-browser-mcp over agents?
- Choose stealth-browser-mcp over agents when Tags unique to stealth-browser-mcp: ai-agents, anti-bot-bypass, browser-automation, web-scraping; stealth-browser-mcp ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need to automate tasks that require bypassing advanced anti-bot detection mechanisms.
- When should I choose agents over stealth-browser-mcp?
- Choose agents over stealth-browser-mcp when Tags unique to agents: agent-skills, agentic-ai, automation, prompt-engineering; You are working specifically within the ecosystems of Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, or Gemini CLI, as it provides tailored plugins for these environments; More GitHub stars (39k vs 1.6k) - visibility, not fit.
- When should I avoid stealth-browser-mcp?
- If your browser automation requirements do not involve evading sophisticated anti-bot systems or mimicking human behavior closely enough to trick such defenses. When the tool's specific approach, which includes AI-generated network hooks and UI cloning, is unnecessary for task completion because simpler solutions can suffice.
- When should I avoid agents?
- You are working solely within a niche environment that isn't one of the supported platforms (like Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc.) because it may not offer compatible plugins or extensive support Your project requirements do not include interoperability between multiple AI agents and you only need to leverage functionalities from a single AI agent with a robust in-built plugin ecosystem
- Is stealth-browser-mcp or agents more popular on GitHub?
- agents has more GitHub stars (38,928 vs 1,559). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are stealth-browser-mcp and agents open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (stealth-browser-mcp: MIT, agents: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to stealth-browser-mcp or agents?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at stealth-browser-mcp alternatives and agents alternatives (stealth-browser-mcp markdown twin, agents markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, stealth-browser-mcp or agents?
- stealth-browser-mcp: Very active. agents: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for stealth-browser-mcp and agents?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: stealth-browser-mcp trust report; agents trust report.