Comparison
chatgpt-plugin-eval vs agentic_security
Verdict
Pick chatgpt-plugin-eval if chatgpt-plugin-eval is an evaluation framework designed specifically to assess security, privacy, and safety concerns related to third-party plugins interfacing with large language models like ChatGPT; pick agentic_security if agentic Security is an agent-based framework for scanning vulnerabilities in large language models with a Python-based toolkit for robust security assessments via fuzz testing.
Markdown twin · chatgpt-plugin-eval alternatives · agentic_security alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | chatgpt-plugin-eval | agentic_security |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (736d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Steady (35d since push) As of 3w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of 3w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Framework for Evaluating Security in LLM Plugin Ecosystems
- agentic_security
- Agentic LLM Vulnerability Scanner / AI red teaming kit
Stars
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- 29
- agentic_security
- 1.9k
Forks
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- 7
- agentic_security
- 270
Open issues
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- 1
- agentic_security
- 70
Language
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- HTML
- agentic_security
- Python
Adopt for
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- chatgpt-plugin-eval is an evaluation framework designed specifically to assess security, privacy, and safety concerns related to third-party plugins interfacing with large language models like ChatGPT.
- agentic_security
- Agentic Security is an agent-based framework for scanning vulnerabilities in large language models with a Python-based toolkit for robust security assessments via fuzz testing.
Persona
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- -
- agentic_security
- -
Runtime
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- -
- agentic_security
- -
License
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- The license information for chatgpt-plugin-eval is unknown.
- agentic_security
- Apache-2.0 - Permissive license encouraging free use and modification under the condition of preserving notices.
Last pushed
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Jul 29, 2024
- agentic_security
- Jun 23, 2026
Categories
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Evaluation & Observability
- agentic_security
- Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks
Trust and health
Maintenance
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Dormant (18%)
- agentic_security
- Steady (60%)
Days since push
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- 736d
- agentic_security
- 35d
Open issues (now)
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- 1
- agentic_security
- 70
Owner type
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Organization
- agentic_security
- User
Full report
- chatgpt-plugin-eval
- Trust report
- agentic_security
- Trust report
Choose chatgpt-plugin-eval if…
- chatgpt-plugin-eval is primarily HTML; agentic_security is Python.
- Tags unique to chatgpt-plugin-eval: chatgpt, llm-plugins, privacy, security.
- - When evaluating the security risks of integrating third-party services into your LLM platform through plugins
When NOT to use chatgpt-plugin-eval
- - In cases where only generic, high-level security guidance is required without an in-depth framework analysis
- - When the primary focus is on improving performance metrics rather than addressing specific security and privacy concerns of LLM plugins
Choose agentic_security if…
- agentic_security is primarily Python; chatgpt-plugin-eval is HTML.
- Tags unique to agentic_security: agent-framework, fuzzing, llm-evaluation, red-teaming.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks.
- agentic_security ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- Developers need to ensure their LLMs are secure from jailbreak attempts and vulnerabilities.
When NOT to use agentic_security
- Teams require solutions that do not involve agent frameworks for vulnerability scanning.
- Projects seek a no-fuzz-testing approach for evaluating LLM security.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (llm-platform-security/chatgpt-plugin-eval) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (llm-platform-security/chatgpt-plugin-eval) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Last push (llm-platform-security/chatgpt-plugin-eval) · observed Jul 29, 2024
- License file (unknown) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (msoedov/agentic_security) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- GitHub forks (msoedov/agentic_security) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- Last push (msoedov/agentic_security) · observed Jun 23, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: chatgpt-plugin-eval 29 · agentic_security 1.9k (synced Aug 5, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between chatgpt-plugin-eval and agentic_security?
- chatgpt-plugin-eval: Framework for Evaluating Security in LLM Plugin Ecosystems. agentic_security: Agentic LLM Vulnerability Scanner / AI red teaming kit. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose chatgpt-plugin-eval over agentic_security?
- Choose chatgpt-plugin-eval over agentic_security when chatgpt-plugin-eval is primarily HTML; agentic_security is Python; Tags unique to chatgpt-plugin-eval: chatgpt, llm-plugins, privacy, security; - When evaluating the security risks of integrating third-party services into your LLM platform through plugins.
- When should I choose agentic_security over chatgpt-plugin-eval?
- Choose agentic_security over chatgpt-plugin-eval when agentic_security is primarily Python; chatgpt-plugin-eval is HTML; Tags unique to agentic_security: agent-framework, fuzzing, llm-evaluation, red-teaming; Also covers LLM Frameworks; agentic_security ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; Developers need to ensure their LLMs are secure from jailbreak attempts and vulnerabilities.
- When should I avoid chatgpt-plugin-eval?
- - In cases where only generic, high-level security guidance is required without an in-depth framework analysis - When the primary focus is on improving performance metrics rather than addressing specific security and privacy concerns of LLM plugins
- When should I avoid agentic_security?
- Teams require solutions that do not involve agent frameworks for vulnerability scanning. Projects seek a no-fuzz-testing approach for evaluating LLM security.
- Is chatgpt-plugin-eval or agentic_security more popular on GitHub?
- agentic_security has more GitHub stars (1,943 vs 29). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are chatgpt-plugin-eval and agentic_security open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.
- Where can I find alternatives to chatgpt-plugin-eval or agentic_security?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at chatgpt-plugin-eval alternatives and agentic_security alternatives (chatgpt-plugin-eval markdown twin, agentic_security markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, chatgpt-plugin-eval or agentic_security?
- chatgpt-plugin-eval: Dormant. agentic_security: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for chatgpt-plugin-eval and agentic_security?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: chatgpt-plugin-eval trust report; agentic_security trust report.