Comparison
wllama vs anubis-oss
Verdict
Pick wllama if webAssembly bindings for browser-based inference of llama.cpp; pick anubis-oss if anubis-oss, specifically tailored for Apple Silicon devices using Swift, is distinguished by its focus on local large language model evaluation and testing within the macOS environment.
Markdown twin · wllama alternatives · anubis-oss alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026
14views this month
Trust & integrity
| Signal | wllama | anubis-oss |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of Sep 7, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Active (15d since push) As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of Sep 7, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- wllama
- WebAssembly binding for llama.cpp - Enabling on-browser LLM inference
- anubis-oss
- Local LLM Testing & Benchmarking for Apple Silicon
Stars
- wllama
- 1.2k
- anubis-oss
- 207
Forks
- wllama
- 121
- anubis-oss
- 15
Open issues
- wllama
- 47
- anubis-oss
- 1
Language
- wllama
- TypeScript
- anubis-oss
- Swift
Adopt for
- wllama
- WebAssembly bindings for browser-based inference of llama.cpp.
- anubis-oss
- Anubis-oss, specifically tailored for Apple Silicon devices using Swift, is distinguished by its focus on local large language model evaluation and testing within the macOS environment.
Persona
- wllama
- -
- anubis-oss
- -
Runtime
- wllama
- -
- anubis-oss
- -
License
- wllama
- MIT
- anubis-oss
- GPL-3.0 license ensures that any derivative works related to anubis-oss must also be open source under the same licensing terms.
Last pushed
- wllama
- Sep 6, 2026
- anubis-oss
- Sep 5, 2026
Categories
- wllama
- Inference & Serving
- anubis-oss
- Evaluation & Observability, Inference & Serving
Trust and health
Maintenance
- wllama
- Very active (96%)
- anubis-oss
- Active (82%)
Days since push
- wllama
- 0d
- anubis-oss
- 15d
Open issues (now)
- wllama
- 47
- anubis-oss
- 1
Stars delta
- wllama
- +37 (30d)
- anubis-oss
- +9 (30d)
Open issues delta
- wllama
- -6 (30d)
- anubis-oss
- -3 (30d)
OSV dependency advisories
- wllama
- Published findings
- anubis-oss
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- wllama
- Trust report
- anubis-oss
- Trust report
Choose wllama if…
- wllama is primarily TypeScript; anubis-oss is Swift.
- License: wllama is MIT, anubis-oss is GPL-3.0.
- Tags unique to wllama: llama, llamacpp, wasm, webassembly.
- Need browser-based LLM inference directly through WebAssembly.
When NOT to use wllama
- Require direct native execution speed benefits unavailable in a WebAssembly context.
- Developing server-side applications without the need for client-side inference capabilities.
Choose anubis-oss if…
- anubis-oss is primarily Swift; wllama is TypeScript.
- License: anubis-oss is GPL-3.0, wllama is MIT.
- Pricing: The tool is free and open-source with no monetary costs for usage or distribution..
- Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM.
- Tags unique to anubis-oss: apple-silicon, benchmarking, gpu, inference.
- Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
- When developing and evaluating large language models intended to run natively on Apple Silicon hardware.
When NOT to use anubis-oss
- If your development does not involve Apple Silicon or macOS environments as Anubis-oss is tightly integrated with these platforms.
- When preferring a language other than Swift, since Anubis-oss depends on this for its operations.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (ngxson/wllama) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (ngxson/wllama) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (ngxson/wllama) · observed Sep 6, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 12, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (uncSoft/anubis-oss) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (uncSoft/anubis-oss) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (uncSoft/anubis-oss) · observed Sep 5, 2026
- License file (GPL-3.0) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: wllama 1.2k · anubis-oss 207 (synced Sep 20, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between wllama and anubis-oss?
- wllama: WebAssembly binding for llama.cpp - Enabling on-browser LLM inference. anubis-oss: Local LLM Testing & Benchmarking for Apple Silicon. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose wllama over anubis-oss?
- Choose wllama over anubis-oss when wllama is primarily TypeScript; anubis-oss is Swift; License: wllama is MIT, anubis-oss is GPL-3.0; Tags unique to wllama: llama, llamacpp, wasm, webassembly; Need browser-based LLM inference directly through WebAssembly.
- When should I choose anubis-oss over wllama?
- Choose anubis-oss over wllama when anubis-oss is primarily Swift; wllama is TypeScript; License: anubis-oss is GPL-3.0, wllama is MIT; Pricing: The tool is free and open-source with no monetary costs for usage or distribution.; Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Tags unique to anubis-oss: apple-silicon, benchmarking, gpu, inference; Also covers Evaluation & Observability; When developing and evaluating large language models intended to run natively on Apple Silicon hardware.
- When should I avoid wllama?
- Require direct native execution speed benefits unavailable in a WebAssembly context. Developing server-side applications without the need for client-side inference capabilities.
- When should I avoid anubis-oss?
- If your development does not involve Apple Silicon or macOS environments as Anubis-oss is tightly integrated with these platforms. When preferring a language other than Swift, since Anubis-oss depends on this for its operations.
- Is wllama or anubis-oss more popular on GitHub?
- wllama has more GitHub stars (1,196 vs 207). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are wllama and anubis-oss open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (wllama: MIT, anubis-oss: GPL-3.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to wllama or anubis-oss?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at wllama alternatives and anubis-oss alternatives (wllama markdown twin, anubis-oss markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, wllama or anubis-oss?
- wllama: Very active. anubis-oss: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for wllama and anubis-oss?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: wllama trust report; anubis-oss trust report.